John Hull:
>Of course Michael Etchison may be right as well (if I read him
correctly), in that firms engage in hueristic pricing and just toss
bathroom maintenance into the mix.<

What firms think they do, and what they actually do, are neither
identical nor even coextensive, of course.  A firm may well adopt a
policy of instituting and rigorously following procedures at the end of
which an array of goods and prices will univocally emerge.  Just between
us, the rigor is not what it seems, in my book.  It is, rather, a way of
presenting what is at bottom an inherently and unavoidably imprecise,
possibly inarticulate (if not inchoate) hunch about what the
consequences of such an array might be. It is a matter at least as much
of rhetoric, as of calculation: The act of calculation is itself
rhetorical.

And, not only is such an approach rhetorical, it is _not falsifiable_.
The firm's response to what happens after the array is instantiated is,
at bottom, heuristic, a reasonably disciplined search for a reasonably
coherent and administrable plan for how to identify data as relevant and
interpret them, and of what to do about the (reasonably disciplined)
inferences the heuristics set up.

Put the other way 'round:   From the _customer's_ point of view, the
entire experience of deciding to enter the premises, deciding what to do
there, and so on is a "mix," which is subjectively taken and assessed
all at once (though much of what happens has something to do with
particular parts of the experience and particular stated prices, and so
on).  If that is so, then whether he knows it or not, all of the
seller's presentation is a "mix," into which every component is
willy-nilly thrown.

Michael
Michael E. Etchison
Texas Wholesale Power Report
MLE Consulting
www.mleconsulting.com
1423 Jackson Road
Kerrville, TX 78028
(830) 895-4005


Reply via email to