In a message dated 8/15/02 1:15:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< --- Robin Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"The corporate management would be given financial
incentives to maximize the market value of these
shares."

Why?  Convince me that the greatest leaders in history
were in it for financial gain.  Sun Tsu, Scipio
Africanus, Cincinatus to name a few ancients, on
through to modern leaders like Roosevelt and Churchill
don't seem to give me the impression of being
motivated by financial concerns.   >>

I'd wondered about that myself; did Professor Hanson mean to lay out the idea 
of corporate managers being given financial incentives to maximize 
shareholder profits as a given, like the notion of the whole country run as a 
corporation to be taken as a starting point, or did he assume that they would 
be given such incentives? I took it as a given, rather than as an assumption 
that he neglected to prove.

I feel fairly confident in believing, however, that he did not mean that the 
financial incentives would produce CEOs with a militaristic or glory-seeking 
bent.

Reply via email to