In a message dated 7/29/03 9:50:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

>That sure looks like the likely outcome.  We never really got a chance
>correct misconceptions about the project.  (For example, it was never 
>intended to forecast specific terrorist attacks, but only overall 
>trends.)  They didn't want to hear.

What?  People in the liberal-statist news media more behaving irrationally?  
more interested in emtionalism than facts?  Whodda thunk it?

Reply via email to