In a message dated 7/29/03 9:50:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >That sure looks like the likely outcome. We never really got a chance >to >correct misconceptions about the project. (For example, it was never >intended to forecast specific terrorist attacks, but only overall >trends.) They didn't want to hear.
What? People in the liberal-statist news media more behaving irrationally? more interested in emtionalism than facts? Whodda thunk it?
