"I still don't see what's in the SdM score for it to be nominated" if there
is nothing in SDM and still getting a nomitaion (irrespective of
OSCAR/Golden Globe/etc) it is biased...IS NOT IT? It implied that.....

Arijit

2008/12/17 Gomzy™ <[email protected]>

>    Can you point where in his post does he mention that the Academy is
> biased
> towards ARR?
>
>  On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Arijit Debnath <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>    someone told in this group Filmfare is biased towards Rahman to give
>> the awards to Guru.... now someone is telling similar way  towards SDM....I
>> think these guys would have brought many more Oscars/Golden Globe being in
>> music practice....what a lose to cater???
>>
>> Someone is not finding anything in SDM to be nominated also...I am pritty
>> sure these so called "SOMEONE" doesn't know what is there in other
>> nominations or also bothered to listen to other nominations (including
>> SDM).....
>>
>> Don't worry...these "SOMEONE" will come and will go...fade away.....
>> Rahman's music will prevail.....
>>
>> Arijit
>>
>> 2008/12/16 Ramesh R <[email protected]>
>>
>>>     So many greats all in one place! Too bad that Thomas Newman wasn't
>>> there.
>>> An interesting read even though I wish that ARR had spoken more. He
>>> clearly hates the temp-tracking and deadlines!
>>> I'm not sure why The Visitor is being considered. It's a 2007 movie. But
>>> the Kaczmarek score is excellent as always.
>>>
>>> I still don't see what's in the SdM score for it to be nominated but
>>> anyways it's nice to see ARR get recognition like this, and interact with
>>> other greats.
>>>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Swapna <[email protected]>
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Sent:* Monday, December 15, 2008 10:40:08 PM
>>> *Subject:* [arr] Oscar Watch: Composer
>>>
>>>  http://www.hollywoo dreporter. com/hr/content_ display/film/
>>> news/e3i728e28ad f80ba3aae5c37a6b 
>>> d621de8e<http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i728e28adf80ba3aae5c37a6bd621de8e>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
>

Reply via email to