I fully agree with you gayathri ... no song can be termed as short lasting 
....cos the whole thing depends on the requirement of the director as per the 
scene.Also each one's like and dislike can be of varying degrees.... so how can 
one say the song is short lasting or not good? One fan might enjoy a slow 
melodious number while another might enjoy a fast foot tapping one. So one can 
hardly generalize on this.

--- On Thu, 5/28/09, Gayathri Chandrakasan <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Gayathri Chandrakasan <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [arr] No new releases for the past 4months.
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 2:59 AM











    
            
            


      
      I beg to differ...I don't think any song for that matter could be 
qualified as average-number.

A  tune/song is composed based on the inspiration given by the director of the 
film and with accordance to the needs of the director. 

Thus, if a Lattoo, or a Aditi is composed in the way it is, the only reason 
would be because the director feels that the particular song is apt for the 
scene in the movie. Therefore to dismiss such songs by saying that it is 
short-lasting and average is simply not right.

And I personally don't think that time is a major drawback for ARR. In fact, 
tt's a known fact that ARR composed for nearly 35 films in the first 5 years of 
his career...and if you guys notice, in the years of 1994-1995 itself, ARR had 
worked in nearly 10 films, creating phenomenal numbers which is evident in 
movies like Duet, May Madham,
 Kadhalan, Karuthama, Puthiya Manargal, Bombay, Indra, etc in addition to his 
first Hindi venture...Rangeela. 

If he could create such beautiful compositions in such a short span of time, 
then time is definitely not a hindrance to his work. Nevertheless, he could 
only produce such compositions if the directors could inspire him and get the 
best out of him.
--- On Wed, 5/27/09, rivjot <riv...@yahoo. com> wrote:

From: rivjot <riv...@yahoo. com>
Subject: Re: [arr] No new releases for the past 4months.
To: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com
Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 1:36 PM








    
      
      Aditi and Guzarish short-lasting and average numbers?? Sorry, I disagree. 
I can agree on Bachchu & Lattoo being average numbers, but not Guzarish & 
Aditi. 



--- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, kishore parayath <kishore.parayath@ ...> 
wrote:

>

> Earlier... ARR releases had gaps more than 8-12 months... Now, when he

> produced more than 6-7 last year, everybody wants him to work in that

> manner..He is NOT a MACHINE!!!!! !!

> 

> TIME is the secret behind every layered masterpiece of ARR!! When he doesnt

> get that, pressure develops, and , he would be forced to sacrifice the

> quality.

> 

> Even last year, instantly catchy, but short-lasting and average numbers(On

> ARR STANDARDS)  like Kabhi Kabhi Aditi, GUZARISH, AYE BACHCHU, LATTOO etc

> were results of LACK OF TIME!!

> 

> If ARR takes time, then the results would be like LAGAAN, SWADES, RANG DE

> BASANTI, ROJA, BOMBAY, RANGEELA, JEANS etc!!

> 

> So DONT force him to work like a FACTORY like Ram Gopal Varma.

> Compared to the list of masterpieces, I have given; the list before

> that(Consisting numbers like Kabhi Kabhi Aditi and Guzarish) are

> DISASTROUS!!

> 

> ARR is one of the BEST COMPOSERS in the world... So, dont interfere in his

> natural working style.

> To get MASTERPIECES from him, we should be patient enough to wait, and give

> him time.

>




 

      


         
        
        




      
 

      

    
    
        
         
        
        








        


        
        


      

Reply via email to