there's no need to insult ram gopal varma..saying he's a factory...he's done a lot to change stereotypical indian movie formulas ..and has directed masterpieces such as Company, Satya, and Shiva (original telugu version)...it is true that he has made subpar work...but one should look at the good over the bad
--- In [email protected], Mahima Sengupta <mahiya_is_mind_blow...@...> wrote: > > I fully agree with you gayathri ... no song can be termed as short lasting > ....cos the whole thing depends on the requirement of the director as per the > scene.Also each one's like and dislike can be of varying degrees.... so how > can one say the song is short lasting or not good? One fan might enjoy a slow > melodious number while another might enjoy a fast foot tapping one. So one > can hardly generalize on this. > > --- On Thu, 5/28/09, Gayathri Chandrakasan <gayathri_c...@...> wrote: > > From: Gayathri Chandrakasan <gayathri_c...@...> > Subject: Re: [arr] No new releases for the past 4months. > To: [email protected] > Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 2:59 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I beg to differ...I don't think any song for that matter could be > qualified as average-number. > > A tune/song is composed based on the inspiration given by the director of > the film and with accordance to the needs of the director. > > Thus, if a Lattoo, or a Aditi is composed in the way it is, the only reason > would be because the director feels that the particular song is apt for the > scene in the movie. Therefore to dismiss such songs by saying that it is > short-lasting and average is simply not right. > > And I personally don't think that time is a major drawback for ARR. In fact, > tt's a known fact that ARR composed for nearly 35 films in the first 5 years > of his career...and if you guys notice, in the years of 1994-1995 itself, ARR > had worked in nearly 10 films, creating phenomenal numbers which is evident > in movies like Duet, May Madham, > Kadhalan, Karuthama, Puthiya Manargal, Bombay, Indra, etc in addition to his > first Hindi venture...Rangeela. > > If he could create such beautiful compositions in such a short span of time, > then time is definitely not a hindrance to his work. Nevertheless, he could > only produce such compositions if the directors could inspire him and get the > best out of him. > --- On Wed, 5/27/09, rivjot <riv...@yahoo. com> wrote: > > From: rivjot <riv...@yahoo. com> > Subject: Re: [arr] No new releases for the past 4months. > To: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com > Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 1:36 PM > > > > > > > > > > > Aditi and Guzarish short-lasting and average numbers?? Sorry, I > disagree. I can agree on Bachchu & Lattoo being average numbers, but not > Guzarish & Aditi. > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, kishore parayath <kishore.parayath@ > ...> wrote: > > > > > > Earlier... ARR releases had gaps more than 8-12 months... Now, when he > > > produced more than 6-7 last year, everybody wants him to work in that > > > manner..He is NOT a MACHINE!!!!! !! > > > > > > TIME is the secret behind every layered masterpiece of ARR!! When he doesnt > > > get that, pressure develops, and , he would be forced to sacrifice the > > > quality. > > > > > > Even last year, instantly catchy, but short-lasting and average numbers(On > > > ARR STANDARDS) like Kabhi Kabhi Aditi, GUZARISH, AYE BACHCHU, LATTOO etc > > > were results of LACK OF TIME!! > > > > > > If ARR takes time, then the results would be like LAGAAN, SWADES, RANG DE > > > BASANTI, ROJA, BOMBAY, RANGEELA, JEANS etc!! > > > > > > So DONT force him to work like a FACTORY like Ram Gopal Varma. > > > Compared to the list of masterpieces, I have given; the list before > > > that(Consisting numbers like Kabhi Kabhi Aditi and Guzarish) are > > > DISASTROUS!! > > > > > > ARR is one of the BEST COMPOSERS in the world... So, dont interfere in his > > > natural working style. > > > To get MASTERPIECES from him, we should be patient enough to wait, and give > > > him time. > > > >
