As far as this one issue goes, if BMC would rather add an "export all
fields" function to the Data Import Tool and rename it the Data
Import/Export tool, that would work too.

I believe the *Web* report type has an "add all fields" capability, but
they left it out of the *AR System* report type for .arx files. It's just a
bit surprising given the main purpose of an .arx formatted file. Perhaps
there was some heinous technical obstacle to adding that functionality?
Maybe?

If I could "shift-click" all the fields in the field selection list and add
them in one go, that would work too!

-JDHood

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Terry Bootsma <[email protected]>
wrote:

> **
> OK.  I guess I'm not the only one that found this as well.  Trying to
> export a .arx file with the MidTier is a lesson in patience and sometimes,
> futility.    (Hint Hint Doug !!).
>
> I thought that perhaps there was a "trick" to do this via the MidTier and
> that I was missing the boat on this one, but I guess I am not?
>
> Terry
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Pierson, Shawn
> *Sent:* December-29-15 8:35 AM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Something to be aware of - the User Tool cannot work with
> overlaid forms on a 9.0 server - FIXED
>
> **
>
> I have to second both “Modify All” and exporting ARX files being much
> easier in the WUT.  I’d also add that certain BMC forms such as those
> related to RBE, are almost impossible to use (at least on 8.x) without
> going through the WUT.  We rely on RBE for a lot of custom email actions
> and I don’t think you can really query and update records (unless you
> customize the forms to add those buttons) if you use the Mid Tier.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> *Shawn Pierson *
>
> Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Rick Cook
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 26, 2015 8:34 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Something to be aware of - the User Tool cannot work with
> overlaid forms on a 9.0 server - FIXED
>
>
>
> **
>
> I find it quite useful when doing large data import tasks with modify all
> functions and all.  Why run all that traffic through the Mid-tier layer for
> an administrative function?
>
> Rick
>
> On Dec 26, 2015 5:02 AM, "JD Hood" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> **
>
> Hi Doug,
>
>
>
> Perhaps BMC should investigate *why* folks are still clinging to the User
> Tool.
>
> What functionality does it provide that is missing in the web client?
> Identify it and where technically possible, add that functionality to the
> web client. Then the *need* (if not desire) for the User Tool will likely
> dissipate.
>
>
>
> For me, the main issue with the web client is ad-hoc reporting. To export
> a standard Remedy .arx file for most any ITSM form (or other form with a
> gazillion fields) is not feasible. That "arsystem" arx export functionality
> *desperately* needs an "add all fields" button to make it easier (humanly
> possible?) to move record(s) out of a given system for purposes of testing,
> development, personal backup, etc.
>
>
>
> But that's just my pet "missing User Tool feature" in the post version 8x
> world. I know others have voiced different "missing User Tool features"
> around these parts. BMC might want to look into it.
>
>
>
> Now, I haven't had an opportunity yet to see what v9x Mid Tier brings in
> this regard, so if BMC has now accounted for my pet issue, then as far as I
> am concerned... um... nevermind. :-)
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> -JDHood
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Mueller, Doug <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Everyone,
>
> Just to be clear here and reinforce some things that have been mentioned.
>
> One commitment we have is compatibility with our API/interfaces.  We want
> to be sure that if you have written a program to the system on any version
> of the server, that it will continue to work on future versions of the
> server.
>
> In this case, there was an api function -- Export specifically -- that had
> a problem with an export format in that it put a name in that format that
> was not able to be properly processed by an existing API program that used
> that operation.  This issue was corrected.
>
> Now, the fact that in this case the API program was the Windows User Tool
> is not the major issue.  It is an API program that stopped working because
> of an issue with the API producing data in a compatible way so that the
> existing functionality of a tool would continue to work.  So, the server
> was corrected to maintain the compatibility of the API.
>
> You will find that we have always been committed to this compatibility.
> Occasionally, there is a miss somewhere -- as in this case -- and that miss
> is corrected.
>
> This commitment is important for anyone who wants to produce an
> integration or interaction with the system.  It means that as the server is
> upgraded, there is no requirement to change the integrations/executables as
> they should continue to work.  Generally, this is true.  It allows you to
> mix and match versions of executables, mid-tier, applications, and server.
>
> NOTE: There is no magic here.  The older executable does not suddenly
> inherit new functionality.  And, when you upgrade to using a new API, the
> program may need to be updated to react to changes in the API/interface.
> But, while continuing to use the older API for that program (even if other
> programs are using the newer API), you can continue without having to
> rebuilt right away.
>
> If you ever see an API incompatibility causing issues across versions,
> please let us know right away.
>
> Doug Mueller
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky
> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2015 12:55 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Something to be aware of - the User Tool cannot work with
> overlaid forms on a 9.0 server - FIXED
>
> Hi,
>
> I think it is great news.
>
> Note that they fixed the AR Server rather than the User Tool.
>
> This was clearly a bug on the server side, as the server did not comply to
> the way the older API worked. The client sends it's API-version along with
> the call to the server, and the server is supposed to talk back to the
> client with that same version of the API.
>
> I see very few who use ARUser.exe as main access to the AR Server
> nowadays, but to look at and add/change core/foundation data it is very
> useful.
>
>         Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)
>
> Ask the Remedy Licensing Experts (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12/13):
> * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
> * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
> Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.
>
> > I was thinking the same thing. This is a dangerous precedent. Just as
> > people are finally accepting WUT is dead it gets some new life (not
> > that I am going to complain).
> >
> > Although thinking about it a little more... there are a number of
> > tools that BMC doesn't officially support but do maintain. Looks like
> > WUT might fall into this class now?
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015, 12:48 AM Thomas Miskiewicz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> **
> >> Thanks for the update Mark. I thought the User Tool is dead.
> >>
> >> On 18 Dec 2015, at 09:45, Walters, Mark <[email protected]
> >> <[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>
> >> **
> >>
> >> *UPDATE – this was fixed in the 9.0 SP1 server – the User Tool can
> >> use overlaid forms again.*
> >>
> >> Knowledge Base article KA427109
> >> <https://kb.bmc.com/infocenter/index?page=content&id=S:KA427109>
> >>
> >> Some changes in the server in version 9.0 mean that the User Tool is
> >> unable to work with overlaid forms.  Searches, creates and modifies
> >> result in a 303 Form does not exist on server error as the client
> >> references the form name with the __o extension which the server does
> not recognise.
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >> *Knowledge Article ID:*
> >>
> >> KA427109
> >> *Version:*
> >>
> >> 0.1
> >> *Available To:*
> >>
> >> External
> >> *Status:*
> >>
> >> Unpublished
> >> *Updated:*
> >>
> >> 06/15/2015
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *Problem*
> >>
> >> The Remedy User Tool client is unable to create records or perform
> >> searches when using overlaid forms from an ARS 9.0 server.  The form
> >> can be opened but any other operations result in an ARERR 303 Form
> >> does not exist on server error.
> >>
> >> *Solution*
> >>
> >>  This is due to changes in the way overlays are stored in the 9.0
> >> metadata. The __o extension is no longer used but the .arf form
> >> definition which is exported by the server, and used by the User
> >> Tool, still includes it.  The client tries to use the form name from
> >> the .arf file when sending API calls to the server but the server
> >> does not recognise the name and returns the 303 error.
> >>
> >> A defect has been created to track this (SW00490959) but, as the User
> >> Tool is no longer supported, it is not clear whether this will be
> addressed.
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >> *Mark Walters*
> >> Lead Technical Support Analyst
> >> *Direct*
> >>
> >> +44 (0)118 921 8379 <%2B44%20%280%29118%20921%208379>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> E2
> >> Eskdale Road
> >> Winnersh, RG41 5TS
> >> UK
> >> <image001.jpg> <http://www.bmc.com/>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> BMC Software Limited Registered Office: Building E2, Eskdale Road,
> >> Winnersh, Wokingham, Berkshire, United Kingdom, RG41 5TS Registered
> >> in England No. 1927903 The content of this email is confidential. If
> >> you are not the addressee, you may not distribute, copy or disclose any
> part of it.
> >> If you receive this message in error, please delete this from your
> >> system and notify the sender immediately. _ARSlist: "Where the
> >> Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> >>
> >> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> > "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the
> Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>
>
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> Private and confidential as detailed here
> <http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx>. If you cannot
> access hyperlink, please e-mail sender. _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> and have been for 20 years_
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to