You’re right – that’s difficult to do.  Licensing costs themselves vary from
customer to customer.  I’ve seen multiple companies work up RFPs on Remedy
systems and be quoted different licensing and support costs from BMC.  And
that’s without the mark-ups that a company may or may not add in.  Could be
the same for S-Now.  Would be nice to see these vendors publish a price list
:) .

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 1:43 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question - Service Now

 

** 

While on this topic, does anyone have a cost comparison between these two
tools? I know this could be a complicated question as the cost of owning
these systems isn’t just cost of systems, licenses, hardware, etc. but also
cost of implementation by way of time and resources. But lets leave the time
and resources aside as those costs are debateable as to which system may be
more cost effective..

 

That may give some of us a better understanding of how attractive these
sytems are to the financial heads of an organization..

 

I *think* I have a slight idea of the costs but the information I have is
not current and licensing models have changed quite a bit since the time I
used to have access to the finanacial information of these systems.

 

Joe

 

  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Ken
Pritchard
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 10:41 PM
To:  <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question - Service Now

 

Everyone is answering this like a bunch of IT folks.  It really comes down
to a risk/cost/reward issue.  What I the (increased) risk of being ‘hacked’
on the cloud vs what in a lot of cases is an outsourced IT department (not
really much different than a cloud IMO) and what is the perceived cost of
any data breach – vs the increased cost of hosting the application vs the
cloud.

 

Basically we in IT look at it as an absolute of which is better, but upper
management – the folks with the purse strings – look at it from a cost
accounting perspective.  For some, the data stored in an ITSM suite system
(custom apps aside – which is where BMC (or should I say Baine Capital) has
shoved them) isn’t more than a mechanism to process service desk calls.  In
effect, unless we’re storing PII in the system (SSNs, etc) is there really a
financial risk with the ITSM system being hacked.

 

Now I know the next statement would probably be that the CMDB contains
information on other systems within the environment that does contain that
type of information, but then it would require that information to contain
information on how to access those other systems.

 

I might be a bit naïve here, but I really don’t see (in most instances)
where upper management would find the risk to exceed the savings.

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Rick
Cook
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 7:29 PM
To:  <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question - Service Now

 

** 

Amazon has already been hacked at least once.   I know of one DoD RoD
customer that hosts their own instance for security reasons. 

Rick

On Jun 15, 2016 16:10, "Joe D'Souza" <jdso...@shyle.net
<mailto:jdso...@shyle.net> > wrote:

** 

I think it mostly comes down to the answer to this question – would you be
ok to let a valet drive and park an expensive car or motorcycle you own or
would you want to do it yourself. Would you trust that valet to tell you
after he has parked it if he accidentally dinked it or hit a huge pot hole
if that dink or damage is not easily visible? If so maybe you are the kind
of person for who services like the cloud would work quite well with if
functionally it offers you everything else you have been looking for.

 

Personally I do not think that services that host cloud based services
publicly acknowledge their service was compromised in the odd event it was
unless it was quite obvious it has been to the end customer which can sort
of be a disturbing thought. There may or may not be a threat or a breach
every month.. Maybe every week. Maybe even every day. I honestly do not
think they would upfront about such incidents when and if it occurs unless
it was quite fatal. It could mean a risk to their business and they would
not want that.

 

Joe

 

  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Pierson,
Shawn
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 8:49 AM
To:  <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question - Service Now

 

Just to play devil’s advocate, theoretically someone whose business depends
on their internet-facing servers being trusted is going to likely spend more
money on security than a company that sells widgets as their primarily line
of business and views I.T. security as just an expense.  I don’t know who
hosts Service Now or BMC’s cloud servers, but I’d expect that they probably
take it very seriously.  Things can definitely slip through but if we’re all
deploying MyIT and such to give people access to Remedy via their
smartphones and tablets off the network, it’s really a question of whose
cybersecurity you trust more.

 

Thanks,

 

Shawn Pierson 

Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:28 PM
To:  <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question - Service Now

 

** 

Exactly – but I would like to add its as safe as someone else’s computer who
gives access to some of his trusted associates facing the internet.

 

So once out there, it is as safe as any other “shared” resource with
“limited public access” on the internet is.

 

Whether you like it or not, that exposes the system to a few more
vulnerabilities than a system that is internal and intranet facing.

 

So whether it is ServiceNOW’s cloud or any other, it is the one risk you
need to assume before investing in it.

 

Joe

 

  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Rod
Harris
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:44 PM
To:  <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question - Service Now

 

** 

If only I had a like button. Yes, cloud does seem to be a bit of a buzzword
that you have distilled nicely with that T-shirt slogan.

Thanks JDHood.

 

On 15 June 2016 at 10:35, JD Hood <hood...@gmail.com
<mailto:hood...@gmail.com> > wrote:

** 

It may be a T-Shirt slogan, but it's relevant nonetheless: "...There is no
"Cloud" - It's just someone else's computer..."

 

-JDHood

 

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Joe D'Souza <jdso...@shyle.net
<mailto:jdso...@shyle.net> > wrote:

** 

I do recall hearing rumors it was – not sure how long time ago. But take
that information with a grain of salt as I do not know much details of what
I had heard.

 

ServiceNOW is primarily a system hosted on the cloud so is as vulnerable or
strong as any other system on the cloud.

 

So IMHO if security of your data is one of your top concerns, the cloud may
not be the best place for you to be at. However strong the security, there
is always a loophole to be found for someone who has the intent to find one.
While this is true for systems hosted internally too, at least the
vulnerability of the system isn’t exposed to the world if your system isn’t
internet facing.

 

Joe

 

  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Sanford,
Claire
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:17 PM
To:  <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Question - Service Now

 

Does anyone know if Service Now has ever had their servers (with customer’s
data) ever been hacked?

 

 

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _ARSlist:
"Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

 

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ 

 

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ 

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ 

Private and confidential as detailed here
<http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx> . If you cannot access
hyperlink, please e-mail sender. 

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _ARSlist:
"Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ 

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _ARSlist:
"Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to