That's a really interesting idea! Thanks for sharing it. -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Terry Bootsma Sent: Wednesday, 23 August 2017 6:28 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Securing Sensitive WO Information
While entry row-level access can do what you want, I've implemented something different that might meet your needs and you may want to think about. I've created a special type of Work Log (Secure Work Log) and only allowed users with certain permissions to view, report, etc. on this type of work log entry. This has the benefit of having people being able to interact with the application and entry (Incident/Change/Work Order) as a whole without the pain of hiding/unhiding/etc. the entry as it is passed between various groups. Any "secure" information needs to be put into the request via the "Secure Work Log" entry. This might work in your situation, based upon your requirements. Something to think about. Terry -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Rackley, James A CIV Sent: August-22-17 8:41 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Securing Sensitive WO Information Roger is correct. Configuring multi-tenancy is not worth the ROI in this instance. Neither is Case Management. We were hoping for a simpler solution at the Support Group level. Regards, Jim -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Roger Justice Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 4:14 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Securing Sensitive WO Information ** His statement is specific Support Group not separate companies. -----Original Message----- From: Deepak Pathak <dpathak1...@gmail.com> To: arslist <arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> Sent: Fri, Aug 18, 2017 3:52 pm Subject: Re: Securing Sensitive WO Information ** I believe that feature is called Multi-Tenancy. On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Rackley, James A CIV <james.a.rack...@uscg.mil> wrote: Oh Mighty Brain Trust, What is the recommended method to ensure that users with Work Order permissions CANNOT see a specific subset of WOs via Global Search, WO Console, Overview, AR Reporting, Analytics, or Smart Reporting? Essentially, only users in a specific Support Group should be able to see anything at all about WOs assigned to this Support Group. Thanks in advance! Regards, Jim Rackley, PMP CGFIXIT Service Manager USCG, C4ITSC, Business Operations Division "You can't help everyone. But everyone can help someone." ____________________________________________________________________________ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.arslist.org&d=DwMCa Q&c=0NKfg44GVknAU-XkWXjNxQ&r=iuYYqFqKHbSOeyo5LY9dkV5F4FpNAQQwkv53Lj1KZMQ&m=b hbd2MzApvpTGxeBSWoFc2I-6QzdkhsaQKFVVHfXFuY&s=Me9JYEPDXPdI2JMa6-H17FULCBbOSVM PpO-lnzyqdD8&e=> "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years" _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ ____________________________________________________________________________ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years" Confidential communication Westpac Banking Corporation (ABN 33 007 457 141) Westpac Institutional Bank is a division of Westpac Banking Corporation _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
