Great Kevin, that’s sounds like a like I can work with. I will give it shot
and yet it’s be great to know how bmc recognizes primary vs secondary.


Thomas


On Wed 24. Apr 2019 at 20:21, Kevin Shaffer <[email protected]>
wrote:

> In addition to what Doug said, we had a similar issue and these are all
> the pre req steps we had to perform to make it work in our environment
> because the prechecker also enforced some things.
>
>
>
> We too spent days looking through numerous XML files for the 
> BMC_IS_SECONDARY_SERVER
> variable but found that our root cause was that DEV was a copy of PROD and
> when we upgraded DEV, all the server group settings in DEV pointed to
> PROD.  In our case I think deleting the servergrp data from the DB and
> deleting all Operation Ranking records, then rebooted.  The install then
> worked for us.
>
>
> Pre-Implementation Tasks
>
>    1. Shut down all AR Servers except for Admin Server
>    2. Delete all Operation Ranking records
>    3. Ensure that Disable_Admin-Ops is set to F in the ar.conf
>    4. Ensure that Server-Group-Member is T in the ar.conf.  Installers
>    for v9 assume that all servers are server groups even if they are stand
>    alone.
>    5. Change the Server-Name parameter from <long name> to host name
>    <short name>
>    6. Delete servgrp_applic where applicable
>    7. Delete servgrp_board where applicable
>    8. Delete servgrp_config where applicable
>    9. Delete servgrp_ftslic where applicable
>    10. Delete servgrp_op_mstr where applicable
>    11. Delete servgrp_userlic where applicable
>    12. Change the parameter, Oracle-Cursor-Sharing, from FORCE to EXACT
>    in the ar.conf
>    13. Change the parameter, Next-ID-Block-Size, from 5 to 100 in the
>    ar.conf
>    14. Change the escalation thread from Private-RPC-Socket: 390603 3 3
>    to Private-RPC-Socket: 390603 6 6 in the ar.conf
>
> HTH
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ARSList <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Reif, Douglas
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 24, 2019 1:13 PM
> *To:* ARSList <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* RE: Installer is performing a secondary server
> install/upgrade, No forms will be imported.
>
>
>
> Thomas,
>
> We often see this problem after a prior install failed but had already
> updated the database.
>
> You run the next install and it checks the dbversion from the control
> table.
>
> See https://communities.bmc.com/docs/DOC-37267.  This shows that for 9104
> the currdbversion would be 57.
>
> So my assumption is that if you checked the control table, you would see
> this, meaning the DB was upgraded.
>
>
>
> The solution for this is to rollback the DB to prior to the upgrade that
> failed.
>
> The upgrades do not rollback the database automatically.  It’s a lot of
> work to undo some of the things the installers does because decisions are
> made dynamically based on the environment.  It’s a lot easier to make a db
> backup or restore point and if the install fails, just revert to that.
>
>
>
> DougR
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ARSList [mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Thomas Miskiewicz
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 24, 2019 10:01 AM
> *To:* ARSList <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Installer is performing a secondary server
> install/upgrade, No forms will be imported.
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> we upgraded one single 7.6.04 server to 9.1.04 and got this at the end: 
> Installer
> is performing a secondary server install/upgrade, No forms will be imported
>
>
>
> Same situation when we try to re-run the installer. Does anyone know where
> does Remedy store the info or how it recognises which type of server
> (primary/secondary)?
>
> (Definitely not via ARSystemInstallationConfiguration as the parameter
> BMC_IS_SECONDARY_SERVER is set to false.)
>
>
>
> BMC Support doesn’t know how to solve this…
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thomas
> --
> ARSList mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist
>
-- 
ARSList mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.rrr.se/cgi/listinfo/arslist

Reply via email to