Correct 100%.  I would like to see rock-solid, irrefutable case studies that 
show how implementing ITIL in a mature environment saves money or delivers some 
other quantifiable benefit.

I do NOT want to hear the old clichés:

- Constant process improvement.
- Better management of services and service delivery.
- Improved integration of maturity models.
- Enhanced process standardization.
- Blah, blah, blah...

No! A) Speak English and B) Show me RESULTS, not buzzwords.

Show me NUMBERS! Show me the MONEY! How has ITIL made a large company more 
profitable?! I want to see it.

I'd especially like to see how a full implementation of BMC's ITSM suite has 
made a sizable company more profitable.


-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of patrick zandi
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 3:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT -- Sort Of: Computerworld reports on ITIL

** 
Gary, 
Read the remarks and find some comfort..
Change always costs money.. and More legislation does not make a better 
worker...
Does anyone on the list remember Cecil Lawson ?  I'll bet he is not an ITIL 
fan... 
The Problem is that ITIL has now be Legislated from Congress to do it that 
way... Why?
COMMERCE !!!  The problem is the overhead on a companies manpower Really 
Stresses it to the Breaking Point.. With little or no Return..
I don't do processes, just because I can and because they are there...  I do 
them because they make sense, Save money, Save time, and Energy.
ITIL does none of those.. so I am against it... I am a RedNeck  I guess..  Why 
buy a new Maserati with all the latest smog, and computers, and bells and 
whistles.. when a 67 Chevy will do the trick for 89K less.. Cause I can?  So 
who is artificially stimulating the economy now? Cohen in congress with a 
mandate that we use ITIL.. 
Yeah that will save us money? Spending more always saves us money...  8-(    
WRONG
CHANGE ALWAYS COSTS MONEY !!! 
 
The only reason we are spending more money, is because we are not content and 
no one is standing in the Gap to say...  No.

 
On 9/19/07, Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

        ** 

        Check out this article. I think it is about us - People resistant to 
ITIL, but forced into going there.

         

        I'm not resistant to ITIL, I guess, I just want an easier way to do it!

         

        
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9037418&pageNumber=1
 
<http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9037418&pageNumber=1>
 

         

        Thanks,

        
        Gary Opela, Jr

        Sr. Remedy Developer

        Leader Communications, Inc.

        405 736 3211

         

        __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML 
in it___ 




-- 
Patrick Zandi __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with 
HTML in it___ 

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to