So okay , fine, do they have the right to dictate where you get support?

yes.

 

Does the way they do it make good business sense?

 

Well, if their profit increases yes, if their market share increases, yes.

 

if the latest Gartner Group report puts BMC Remedy almost out of the leaders
quadrant

and remarks on support and other similar complaints, well then, perhaps not.

 

[yes they were still ahead of everyone else, but almost out of the visionary
quadrant?]

 

That being said, I still love the Remedy ARSystem, and even the ITSM suite
does deliver functionality

(perhaps not as cleanly or simply as it once did, perhaps with some really
crappy coding)

but it does it. To the End User. Which ain't the Developer, it is the person
at the other end.

 

The issue for us as developers is that the software suite that was once
considered a framework to build on,

BMC now wants to be defined as the end result. Ironic since ITIL is a
framework that the ITSM suite supports

which would imply flexibility.

 

. Daniel

 

  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: September 19, 2007 6:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: BMC Support

 

** 

Remember, we don't buy software from BMC or other major vendors, we buy
licenses to USE the software, under conditions specified by the seller in
the EULA.  So while you can keep the SW once you stop paying for licenses,
if you can't use it, what's the difference between having it and not having
it? 

 

Rick
 

On 9/19/07, Susan Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

** 

Andy,

 

But is it their property?  There's not a point when I have to give it back,
it's not leased.  I really feel I'm buying the product when I initially buy
the licenses.  I pay for the licenses and then I pay for the support
separately.  

 

I don't see why they have the right to dictate (i.e. dictatorship).  Should
I be using the term free enterprise as opposed to capitalism?  I should be
free to find the support enterprise that best suits my company's needs.  

 

If I buy a car at one dealership, I can go to another dealership to get
service (support).  The dealerships have different ownership but they both
are authorized sellers (or partners) of the mother company.  They don't own
my car.  They may not want to loose the service $$$$ but then they should
have to compete for those $$$$ also by providing the best service. 

 

Susan

 

 


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to