In relation to AR System function, is the max B.C. value (1/1/4713 BC) any
more or less an arbitrary value than that of the UNIX Epoch (1/1/1970)?  I
agree that an unlimited value (or a value that was allowed to the same level
as A.D. or B.C.) would have been more useful to the 0.01% of Remedy
installations used by archaeologists and the like.  Would love to hear from
someone who knows how the maximum B.C. value was determined, and why.

Rick

On 10/17/07, Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I think you can get rid of the BC using some text-editing technique
> (I've seen someone post on the list how to do it), but I do agree it is
> useless. I've had customers click it thinking it meant Business
> Continuance for some reason.
>
> I would imagine, maybe, if you used remedy to track fossils or
> something, then the BC field might be used in a date field describing
> from when the dinosaur came, however, I think that date fields can only
> go back so far, and doubt they can go back to 40,000,000 yrs ago.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Gary Opela, Jr
>
> Sr. Remedy Developer
>
> Leader Communications, Inc.
>
> 405 736 3211
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Sundberg
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 8:27 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: ADM: Annual are you going to BMC UserWorld qeustionaire
> available
>
> **
> I filled out the survey --
>
> Just wondering in general on the date fields -- has anybody ever
> selected BC for a valid reason?
>
> I figure -- ARS has 10,000 sites (not sure/what I have heard -- but
> guessing).
> The average site does 100,000 tickets/year -- this I know this as fact.
> (kidding)
>
> So - that is 1,000,000,000 tickets/yr.
>
> I would guess - that not one ticket -- has a real use of BC.
>
> Can anybody prove me wrong?
>
> If that is the case -- anybody think the default should not include BC?
>
> PS - the survey did not work on Safari-Mac. I would be willing to donate
> a Kinetic Survey and Kinetic Request license to the ARSList -- Dan --
> hit me up if interested.
>
>
> -John
>
>
>
> On 10/17/07, Daniel Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>        **
>
>        If you go to www.wwrug.org <http://www.wwrug.org/>
>
>        On the left hand side there is a link to the "Attendance
> Survey".
>
>
>
>        This gives me an idea of how many will be there and how many
>
>        pins I should be dragging around to hand out to folks that are
> there.
>
>
>
>        For any first timers, there is a pin that shows you are a member
> of
>
>        the ARSlist. If you see me, I usually have some with me. I will
>
>        also leave some at any booth of companies that sponsor the list
>
>        (our new sponsor should be announced at UserWorld. I have a
> commitment
>
>        just no check in hand yet).
>
>
>
>        ... Daniel
>
>        p.s. I have given up trying to have them handed out at the
> registration desk,
>
>        it is always more stress than it is worth

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to