I believe 01/01/4713 BC = Oracle Julian Date value of 0
 
it is also the value 0 in dBase of a Timestamp field 
 
Fred

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 9:26 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ADM: Annual are you going to BMC UserWorld qeustionaire
available


** 
In relation to AR System function, is the max B.C. value (1/1/4713 BC)
any more or less an arbitrary value than that of the UNIX Epoch
(1/1/1970)?  I agree that an unlimited value (or a value that was
allowed to the same level as A.D. or B.C.) would have been more useful
to the 0.01% of Remedy installations used by archaeologists and the
like.  Would love to hear from someone who knows how the maximum B.C.
value was determined, and why.
 
Rick
 
On 10/17/07, Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

        I think you can get rid of the BC using some text-editing
technique
        (I've seen someone post on the list how to do it), but I do
agree it is 
        useless. I've had customers click it thinking it meant Business
        Continuance for some reason.
        
        I would imagine, maybe, if you used remedy to track fossils or
        something, then the BC field might be used in a date field
describing 
        from when the dinosaur came, however, I think that date fields
can only
        go back so far, and doubt they can go back to 40,000,000 yrs
ago.
        
        Thanks,
        
        
        Gary Opela, Jr
        
        Sr. Remedy Developer
        
        Leader Communications, Inc.
        
        405 736 3211
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Sundberg 
        Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 8:27 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: ADM: Annual are you going to BMC UserWorld
qeustionaire
        available
        
        **
        I filled out the survey -- 
        
        Just wondering in general on the date fields -- has anybody ever
        selected BC for a valid reason?
        
        I figure -- ARS has 10,000 sites (not sure/what I have heard --
but
        guessing).
        The average site does 100,000 tickets/year -- this I know this
as fact. 
        (kidding)
        
        So - that is 1,000,000,000 tickets/yr.
        
        I would guess - that not one ticket -- has a real use of BC.
        
        Can anybody prove me wrong?
        
        If that is the case -- anybody think the default should not
include BC? 
        
        PS - the survey did not work on Safari-Mac. I would be willing
to donate
        a Kinetic Survey and Kinetic Request license to the ARSList --
Dan --
        hit me up if interested.
        
        
        -John
        
        
        
        On 10/17/07, Daniel Bloom < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
        
               **
        
               If you go to www.wwrug.org <http://www.wwrug.org/ >
        
               On the left hand side there is a link to the "Attendance
        Survey".
        
        
        
               This gives me an idea of how many will be there and how
many
        
               pins I should be dragging around to hand out to folks
that are 
        there.
        
        
        
               For any first timers, there is a pin that shows you are a
member
        of
        
               the ARSlist. If you see me, I usually have some with me.
I will
        
               also leave some at any booth of companies that sponsor
the list 
        
               (our new sponsor should be announced at UserWorld. I have
a
        commitment
        
               just no check in hand yet).
        
        
        
               ... Daniel
        
               p.s. I have given up trying to have them handed out at
the 
        registration desk,
        
               it is always more stress than it is worth

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to