Claire,
If you get hold of a picture of the on-call screen, it
will tell you a longer story than doing a demo. See
ITSM config guide. There's not much do demo about
paging, which is what the on-call feature does. It
does NOT do assignment.i9

Here's ITSM 7's on call feature in a nut shell. I am
trying to come up an emoticon for a nut shell, but I
can't so please exercise your imagination:

ENABLE A GROUP TO BE ON-CALL
(1)You go to a Group's record and flag it as an
on-call group (On Call Group?=Yes).

-Doing so allows you to setup on-call info for that
group.

-Doing so causes that group to lose all ability to
receive regular assignment emails. Can't be fixed with
just a data configuration.

HOW TO SET IT UP
(2)You go to the group's on-call tab and define
on-call info. 
This is what you can do:
For the group, you can say, for blah blah priority or
higher, for blah blah kind of record (incident,
change) page this person or pager on assignment.

There can be two kinds of on-call notification
recipients:
-a person that is defined in the CTM:People form. You
can define any number of such dudes to be on call for
a group on separate records

or
-a designated pager. In this case, the assumption is
that the pager is passed around among on-call people,
so you enter the pager info directly, not a person
info.

For *each* record you define, you can designate a
paging schedule, so that that dude or the generic
pager is paged only during designated hours (basically
workday/holiday info)

Now on group assignment, only on call people will be
notified, and only thru page.

CAVEATS
-As I mentioned before, once a group is flagged
on-call, its members won't get email notifications
about assignment.

-all of user's notification preferences are ignored by
on call paging. The only info looked at on user's
CTM:People record is the pager address, the regular
pager address and pager email.

-if you want pager email to be used, you can't use
Remedy's email engine! You are supposed to define a
run process action command line in pager config form,
just like you need to do for regular paging!

-There are quite a number of bugs and deficiencies and
some unanswered questions. For example, I saw a few
times that not only Assgined Group, but Owner Group's
on-call people were paged as well, but BMC denies
that's supposed to happen. I have seen other
inconsistent behaviors.

-The nastiest bug is that if a record is assigned to
an on call group and later a person's name is put on
Assignee field, the ENTIRE on-call population for that
group is paged saying "...has been assigned to YOU."
No fix yet.

-If you didn't notice, the on-call person is NOT
assigned the record. The idea is the on call PEOPLE
are paged and hopefully wake up and dutifully self
assign. Assignee is not dictated by on-call settings.

Assigned person selection in ITSM 7 (or any custom
app) is done by Assignment Engine. You can do round
robin, load balance by least case load, and load
balance by capacity. I can imagine a custom on-call
feature that uses the third option to do what you want
to do by increasing on-call people's capacities.


If I was trying to explain ITSM 7 on-call to
anybody--its abilities and limitation--this
description would be the quickest way. 

A demo or the user guide text gives you high level
info, but all the nuances that may be critical for you
need to be extracted out of the system by pounding it
with all sorts of test cases and pondering over the
results or logs.

If you have specific questions, let me know. I
customized this feature and have gotten it more
flexible and less buggy.

Ok, I admit this nut became huge and is even bulging
out of the shell, but hey you asked for it...or some
of it. :)


--- "Sanford, Claire"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Our On-Call is a huge mess!  We have 42 on-call
> group schedules.  Maybe
> 10 are the same.   It sounds like the on call
> functionality included is
> not what we need.
>  
> Our management wants Remedy to look at the CTI, then
> the assignment
> group (which could be up to 3 different ones based
> on Region) and assign
> the ticket automatically to the person on-call.
>  
>  
> Thank you all for the replies both on and off list.
>  
> Claire
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 1:33 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: ITSM 7 - Demo Server
> 
> 
> ** 
> I can't recall seeing any of my customers say that
> it was set up in a
> way that really matched how they currently use
> "on-call".  Some of the
> architecture and naming needs to be updated to fit
> how people do it now
> vs. 5 years ago, when it was probably quite
> adequate. 
>  
> So, props for having that functionality, but they
> need to make it more
> flexible to fit the many ways that companies could
> use it.
>  
> Rick
>  
> On 11/19/07, Pierson, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote: 
> 
>       Claire,
>       
>       What functionality are you looking for?  While I
> can't give you
> access
>       to a server, I can tell you that the portion I
> worked with isn't
> very 
>       good.  There is no email functionality for paging,
> for example,
> so you
>       have no option other than something like Telalert
> if you want to
> use it.
>       What I did after getting help on the ARSList was to
> set up dummy
> users 
>       for each on-call group, then mark the users as
> unavailable for
>       assignment so they don't show up in lists.
>       
>       Without notifications being able to be set up
> right, I didn't
> even
>       evaluate the ability to assign to a specific person
> after hours
> each 
>       week or anything like that, so someone else may be
> able to
> assist you.
>       
>       Thanks,
>       
>       Shawn Pierson
>       
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: Action Request System discussion
> list(ARSList)
>       [mailto: [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]> ] On
> Behalf Of Sanford, Claire
>       Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 1:06 PM
>       To: [email protected]
>       Subject: ITSM 7 - Demo Server
>       
>       Does anyone out in Remedy land have a server that
> can be viewed
> remotely 
>       that has the ITSM 7 package installed on it?
>       
>       All I want to do is look at the On-Call
> functionality.  The
> manuals
>       don't give much information about it and it would
> be the main
> reason we
>       would even consider moving to ITSM 7. 
>       
>       
>       Claire Sanford
>       Information Systems Division
>       Memorial Hermann Healthcare System
>       Phone: 713 448 6035
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       
>       
>
________________________________________________________________________
>       _______
>       UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at
> www.arslist.org
>       Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where
> the Answers
> Are"
>       
>       Private and confidential as detailed <a
> 
>
href="http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail
> ">here</a>.  If you cannot access hyperlink, please
> e-mail sender.
>       
>       
>
________________________________________________________________________
> _______
>       UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at
> www.arslist.org
>       Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where
> the Answers
> Are"
>       
> 
> 
> __20060125_______________________This posting was
> submitted with HTML in
> it___ 
> 
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at
> www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where
> the Answers Are"
> 



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. 
Make Yahoo! your homepage.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to