Yes its a 9 digit number .. so a 600 million range and above is good.. JT,
thank you for the correction..

So if you have used the 500 million range or below as the custom field ID,
change that to a higher.. You will not get that warning if you use the 600
million range (9 digit number).

It is specifically fields you have created that you 'let the ARS assign the
field ID's' that you should be worried about as it is highly likely a
careless developer at BMC may use that ID for trim fields.. It has happened
before and giving the benefit of doubt to the Remedy engineers and
developers, could happen again..

Sorry for the confusion..

Joe
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of J.T. Shyman
  Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 10:42 AM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: What specifically breaks upgrades?


  **
  I think Joe missed a word. It should be in the 6 hundred million range.
(600000000-699999999)



  --- J.T. Shyman




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Moore, Christopher Allen
  Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 10:07 AM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: What specifically breaks upgrades?



  Joe-

  Sorry if I’m confused here, but I want to be sure I have this straight!

  I was just creating a field and I gave it an ID of 6,500,000 (you said “In
case you have already done the above, I would use the archgid to correct the
problem and give your fields an ID on or above the 6 million range..”) and
got popup saying “You have specified a field ID in the reserved
range…proceed?”

  I did not- but is that ok? Are you saying when we create new
fields/workflow we should give it IDs over 6mil and ignore that warning?

  Chris






----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J.T. Shyman
  Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:08 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: What specifically breaks upgrades?



  Rick, if you have the 7.1 Patch 2 email.linux.tar.gz file you can open it
with Winzip or 7-zip and find the archgid utility in the /arsystem/linux
folder. You can then copy this to your server.



  Unfortunately, getting the Windows version requires installing the Email
application.



  --- J.T. Shyman




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
  Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:41 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: What specifically breaks upgrades?



  ** Must be a Windows thing.  It is not installed with AR System or Email
on Linux RHEL.  That's using the 7.1.0 patch 2 installs.

  Rick

  On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Joe D'Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  **

  Rick,



  It is released to the best of my knowledge.. It usually gets installed
with the Email installation of 7.1?



  These are the initial results I get if I run it which sounds like it is
the new version..



  E:\Program Files\AR System\AREmail\KCH1D001>archgid
  Action Request System  Change ID Utility   Version 7.1.00 Build
200707311333
  (c) Copyright 2002-2007 BMC Software, Inc.




  Enter user name:



  I haven't used this version of it to say if it works or not but I would
assume it should..



  Cheers



  Joe

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Cook
    Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 2:11 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: What specifically breaks upgrades?

    ** Good advice, Joe, except that AFAIK, archgid isn't available for v7.1
yet - if it ever will be.  I don't think the 7.0 one will work against 7.1.

    Rick

    2008/3/12 Joe D'Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

    **

    Allen,



    I would put using reserved field ranges to create your custom fields to
be a number 1.. By reserved I do not mean AR System reserved but the ones
that Remedy Developers use for their application.. If in case you have
created custom fields and using their range that they usually create fields
from, then in the event that they use the same ID, it could break your
upgrade..



    I would say the same thing for using the immediately available user
range.. Avoid those too.. I have seen Remedy engineering using some of those
fields for trim fields etc. too in the past, as they do not bother to give
those trim fields a specific ID.. stay clear of those.. use ranges above the
6, 7 or 8 million range.. That way you could be sure that they would not
invade that range..



    In case you have already done the above, I would use the archgid to
correct the problem and give your fields an ID on or above the 6 million
range..



    Cheers



    Joe

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Moore, Christopher Allen
      Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 12:56 PM
      To: [email protected]
      Subject: What specifically breaks upgrades?

      **

      Hey everyone-



      I'm putting together a plan to upgrade from 7.0 to 7.1.  We have done
some modifications to the system, but nothing too drastic.  Form changes,
additional workflow, but (as far as I know) no changes to the BMC OOTB
workflow.



      What sorts of changes specifically are problematic when upgrading?



      Windows Server

      SQL DB



      Thanks!

      Chris

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1328 - Release Date: 3/13/2008
11:31 AM

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to