I haven't tried it with Remedy but from what I picked up in a 2005 class a
snapshot may work a bit better.  From the labs we did in class seem to make
a pretty clean copy of the db but I haven't messed with it in the real world
yet.

Jason

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Moore, Christopher Allen <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> **
>
> Phil-
>
>
>
> Thanks for the reply.  I he did use transactional, which seems like it
> should not have caused problems, and the BMC tech we talked to said it was
> supported.
>
>
>
> Once he put it on the dev side, everything appeared to be fine until form
> changes occurred- if you have anyone looking to use it I'd definitely
> suggest testing it on a test/dev install and doing form changes both in the
> admin tool and the class manager to make sure things are acting like they
> should.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Phil Murnane
> *Sent:* Friday, June 06, 2008 9:29 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Cautionary tale? SQL Replication service and Remedy
>
>
>
> Chris:
>
>
>
> What kind of "replication" did your DBA set up?  We have a customer looking
> at this type of configuration in order to create a reporting server.
> They're deciding between either transactional replication with a read-only
> consumer or a mirrored database with snapshots.
>
>
>
> BTW, we did some testing a few years ago with SQL Server 2000 and
> transactional replication with read-write consumers, and that failed
> miserably because SQL Server added columns to every table to be replicated,
> which of cource confused arserver.exe terribly.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Phil
>   __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> html_____Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers
> Are" html___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to