If you look at the rule, where does it get the approver from?

Axton Grams

The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed
in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.
My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a
role as a spokesperson,

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Pierson, Shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks.  I looked at this process and it appears to be ok, and has all the 
> default settings from BMC.
>
> What is also strange is that this same process works the vast majority of the 
> time, but occasionally has this issue.  In running a query, I was able to 
> determine that this happened on 16 different change requests (out of over 
> 400) created in the past 20 days or so, even though they seem to be virtually 
> identical to other changes.  In some cases, we even have templates that 
> normally work (tied to product categories that bring in default approvers) 
> that are used.  These templates have failed twice out of a larger number of 
> successful uses.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Axton
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 2:12 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Approval Engine 7.1 Issues
>
> Take a look at this section:
>
>
> Initiated by  -- tyates
> Category      -- Approval
> Command       -- New-Details
> Source Form   -- CHG:Infrastructure Change
> Entry ID      -- CRQ000000009176
> Tag           -- Change Level IA - Review
> Field ID 1    -- 0
> Field ID 2    -- 0
> Field ID 3    -- 0
> ...
> Get first approver
> Check prep get next approver rules
>   Process next approver rule Change Level IA - Review - Get Next Approver
>      --> Run If passed -- perform set of next approver list for this rule
>   Starting processing of set fields operation
>   Done processing of set fields operation -- no value retrieved so no set
> Set approval details record for this entry to state Error
>
>
> The approval rule "Change Level IA - Review - Get Next Approver" for
> approval process "Change Level IA - Review" is not able to determine
> the first approver, which results in an error.  Take a look at the
> configuration data for the "Change Level IA - Review" approval
> process.
>
> Axton Grams
>
> The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed
> in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.
> My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a
> role as a spokesperson,
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Pierson, Shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> **
>>
>> Here is a sample of where an error occurs.  We are not using the out of the 
>> box approvals exactly, but they are close, so this may look a little 
>> different.  I cut off the end of this where it actually goes into the error 
>> processing of the approval process because that part is working.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any advice you may have.
>>
>>
>>
>> Shawn Pierson
>>
>>
>>
>> <APPR> Get a list of Approval items to process  (Wed May 06 2009 
>> 08:37:58.9270)
>>
>> <APPR> 0 new item(s) found  (Wed May 06 2009 08:37:58.9270)
>>
>> <APPR>    1 new item(s) found
>>
>> <APPR> Processing item number 0  (Wed May 06 2009 08:37:58.9430)
>>
>> <APPR>       Initiated by  -- tyates
>>
>> <APPR>       Category      -- Approval
>>
>> <APPR>       Command       -- Add-Sig
>>
>> <APPR>       Source Form   -- CHG:Infrastructure Change
>>
>> <APPR>       Entry ID      -- CRQ000000009176
>>
>> <APPR>       Tag           -- Change Level IA - Review
>>
>> <APPR>       Field ID 1    -- 0
>>
>> <APPR>       Field ID 2    -- 999
>>
>> <APPR>       Field ID 3    -- 0
>>
>> <APPR>       Other Short   --
>>
>> <APPR>             ggraber
>>
>> <APPR>    Process an 'Add-Sig' command
>>
>> <APPR>    Working with process Change Level IA - Review
>>
>> <APPR>    Have an existing Approval Detail record, see if active
>>
>> <APPR>    Expanding roles for approver(s): ggraber
>>
>> <APPR>    Create a new Signature Line record
>>
>> <APPR>       created new signature line entry with ID 000000000024058
>>
>> <APPR>       Prepare notification for New Signature
>>
>> <APPR>          Getting alternates for approver(s): ggraber
>>
>> <APPR>             No alternates defined for this approver list
>>
>> <APPR>          Sent to ggraber
>>
>> <APPR>    Delete pending item -- 000000001027791
>>
>> <APPR>    Sleeping for 30:00 minutes ...
>>
>> <APPR> Get a list of Approval items to process  (Wed May 06 2009 
>> 08:38:21.2550)
>>
>> <APPR> 0 new item(s) found  (Wed May 06 2009 08:38:21.2710)
>>
>> <APPR>    1 new item(s) found
>>
>> <APPR> Processing item number 0  (Wed May 06 2009 08:38:21.2710)
>>
>> <APPR>       Initiated by  -- tyates
>>
>> <APPR>       Category      -- Approval
>>
>> <APPR>       Command       -- New-Details
>>
>> <APPR>       Source Form   -- CHG:Infrastructure Change
>>
>> <APPR>       Entry ID      -- CRQ000000009176
>>
>> <APPR>       Tag           -- Change Level IA - Review
>>
>> <APPR>       Field ID 1    -- 0
>>
>> <APPR>       Field ID 2    -- 0
>>
>> <APPR>       Field ID 3    -- 0
>>
>> <APPR>    Process a 'New-Details' command
>>
>> <APPR>    Working with process Change Level IA - Review
>>
>> <APPR>    Have an existing Approval Detail record, see if active
>>
>> <APPR>    Check auto-approve rules
>>
>> <APPR>    Checking for Signature Collector Rules
>>
>> <APPR>       Process get authority rule Change Level IA - Review - Get 
>> Authority - Get APD ID
>>
>> <APPR>          --> Run If passed -- perform set fields for this rule
>>
>> <APPR>       Starting processing of set fields operation
>>
>> <APPR>          Temp Char 1 (13060) = APD000000000018
>>
>> <APPR>       Done processing of set fields operation
>>
>> <APPR>       Process get authority rule Change Level IA - Review - Get 
>> Authority - Check Approvers
>>
>> <APPR>          --> Run If passed -- perform set fields for this rule
>>
>> <APPR>       Starting processing of set fields operation
>>
>> <APPR>       Done processing of set fields operation -- no value retrieved 
>> so no set
>>
>> <APPR>    Skip self-approve rules as approval request not from originator of 
>> entry
>>
>> <APPR>    Check for self-assign as approval not initiated by owner
>>
>> <APPR>       Option set to never self-assign
>>
>> <APPR>    Get first approver
>>
>> <APPR>    Check prep get next approver rules
>>
>> <APPR>       Process next approver rule Change Level IA - Review - Get Next 
>> Approver
>>
>> <APPR>          --> Run If passed -- perform set of next approver list for 
>> this rule
>>
>> <APPR>       Starting processing of set fields operation
>>
>> <APPR>       Done processing of set fields operation -- no value retrieved 
>> so no set
>>
>> <APPR>    Set approval details record for this entry to state Error
>>
>> <APPR>       Clean all related support entries attached to detail record
>>
>> <APPR>          Processed signature line 000000000024056
>>
>> <APPR>          Processed signature line 000000000024057
>>
>> <APPR>          Processed signature line 000000000024058
>>
>> <APPR>    Perform done rules
>>
>> <APPR>       Process done rule Change Level IA - Review - Error
>>
>> <APPR>          --> Match -- done rule applied
>>
>> <APPR>       Starting processing of set fields operation
>>
>> <APPR>          TempApprovalServerResult (301311800) = Error
>>
>> <APPR>          Active Approval (1000003278) =
>>
>> <APPR>          Change Request Status (7) = 5
>>
>> <APPR>          Status Reason (1000000150) =
>>
>> <APPR>       Done processing of set fields operation
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Axton
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 12:53 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Approval Engine 7.1 Issues
>>
>>
>>
>> ** Generally, in the approval logs, the section that reports an error will 
>> say why.  Can you post that portion of the logs?
>>
>> Axton Grams
>>
>> The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in 
>> this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.  My 
>> voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a 
>> spokesperson,
>>
>>
>>
>> Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, 
>> please e-mail sender.
>> _Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>
> Private and confidential as detailed here: 
> http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail . If you cannot access the 
> link, please e-mail sender.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to