This has not been done, either in ITSM 7.5 or ITSM 7.5.1....
The pool field in the ITSM OOTB escalations is blank, so therefore all of them 
execute in the 1st escalation thread.

My understanding was also that this was going to be an enhancement in ITSM 7.5, 
but it seems like this undertaking has been more complex than originally 
thought, and therefore has been delayed

-Guillaume

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Tony 
Worthington
Sent: Thu 05/07/09 1:29 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ITSM7 escalation thread whitepaper?
 
A while back there was a discussion around moving various ITSM7 
escalations to their own threads after the release of 7.1.

Does anyone know if there was anything ever produced on this topic or if 
the escalations in ITSM7.5 were optimized by specifying a thread/pool?

Thanks,
Tony


  Tony Worthington
  Sr. Technical Analyst
  Kohl's Department Stores
  N56 W17000 Ridgewood Drive
  Menomonee Falls, WI 53051
  262.703.7763 (phone)
  tony.worthing...@kohls.com
  www.kohls.com

**********************************************************************
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This is a transmission from Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
and may contain information which is confidential and proprietary.
If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution or use of 
the contents of this message is expressly prohibited.
If you have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and notify 
us immediately at 262-703-7000.

CAUTION:
Internet and e-mail communications are Kohl's property and Kohl's reserves the 
right to retrieve and read any message created, sent and received.  Kohl's 
reserves the right to monitor messages by authorized Kohl's Associates at any 
time
without any further consent.


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

<<attachment: ATT118741.jpg>>

Reply via email to