David,
That sounds reasonable, because that could be the first step that needs to
occur---get the servers.
I am assuming there will be other "tickets" before all is said and done...to
configure the box, install
software.

For a request for x hours of consulting from, say, the network
group...does that fit anywhere in ESS?

Thank you.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:50 PM, David Sanders <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Ray
>
> In ESS, they would be Requisition requests...
>
> HTH
>
> David Sanders
> Remedy Solution Architect
> Enterprise Service Suite @ Work
> ==========================
>
> tel +44 1494 468980
> mobile +44 7710 377761
> email [email protected]
>
> web http://www.westoverconsulting.co.uk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray T.
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 8:14 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: How do you track requests for design, consulting, setup?
>
> Michiel,
> So, you would treat a request to have new server with xyz software
> installed as a Change Request.
> I am assuming you do the same for a request to have some experts be
> available for y days for consultation. Ok. Thank you for your input.
>
> Anybody else? In your environment, would these requests start out as a
> Change Request? In ITSM's CM module? I want to say it is not common to
> treat such requests as Change Requests, but you guys tell me.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Michiel Beijen<[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Ray,
> >
> > I hope my answer helps you a bit.
> >
> > Apart from the incident requests, you can distinguish three kind of
> requests:
> >
> > Usually, you'd have processes and procedures in place for some of
> > these requests, and that do not need approval by the Change Advisory
> > Board (CAB) or management - for instance for the installation of
> > MSSQL, user account setup, or the inboarding of a new employee. That
> > would mean you could treat those requests as a so called "standard
> > change" - these are change requests that do not need approval. You can
> > track these as a separate 'incident type' in the IM tool (where
> > technically, they are change requests).
> >
> > You can define two other types of changes; you'd have changes where
> > you have the processes in place but that need approval of management
> > or the CAB because of the financial or other impact; such as requests
> > for new servers etc. You'd want to track them in the Change Management
> > part of your application. For this category, the major part of the
> > work is most of the times in the execution of the change.
> > The last category is changes that do not have a pre-defined procedure,
> > such as custom integration requests and other 'advanced' stuff. Those
> > type of change requests can be handled more as projects than as
> > changes, and most of the time the majority of the work is in the
> > change preparation. The difference between the last two categories of
> > changes is that you will be able to use pre-defined change templates
> > in the first category with pre-defined tasks attached for your
> > different skill-groups and in the last category it will be more
> > free-form and different for every change.
> >
> > The 'beauty' of a solution such as SRM is that it does not matter for
> > a customer in what category their request is, they just select in a
> > punch-out-catalog style what they need and SRM will generate tasks
> > (incidents, changes, whatever) for the back-end. With the standard
> > 'requester console' has templates you can use that provide very
> > limited functionality but can also work for you, depending on your
> > needs.
> >
> > --
> > Michiel Beijen
> > Software Consultant
> > +31 6 - 457 42 418
> > Bee Free IT + http://beefreeit.nl
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 21:10, Ray T.<[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Let me simplify the question.
> >>
> >> Can you just tell me, what is this kind of request called and where
> >> would somebody enter/track it in your environment?...
> >>
> >> I need a Windows 2003 server and have MSSQL xyz be installed on it.
> >> I need consulting (advice/design) on what is the best way to design my
> >> new department's local network?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Ray T.<[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> Hi all
> >>> I want to poll you guys about how requests for design, consulting, or
> >>> project related work etc are tracked (as opposed to breakfixes) in
> >>> your invironment. Using which I and what tracking
> >>> system/modules.
> >>>
> >>> Say somebody (a "Customer") is requesting ("Server Group") that 3
> >>> servers be purchased and setup a certain way for use by area x in your
> >>> environment. How would this request follow and be tracked in your
> >>> environment?
> >>>
> >>> Let me give this a try myself...you guys add/remove/correct, provide
> >>> alternatives, or just tell me what happens in your organization. And
> >>> tell me which parts are generally tracked in Remedy (say in BMC's
> >>> standard products).
> >>>
> >>> Customer opens a request to Server Group for the whole work in...
> >>> a Work Order system (internal or external to Remedy)? Service Request
> >>> system? Is it common to use Remedy's SRM for this? I think a good way
> >>> to do this would be to have a service catalog defined and on the SRM
> >>> module request for this service, right? If you don't have SRM module,
> >>> and say you have only ITSM...you may use an Incident with a
> >>> Type="request" to indicate it's a request for a service and not a
> >>> breakfix?
> >>>
> >>> Then the Server Group would place PO their usual way, fi they need to
> >>> get new servers. inside or outside of Remedy. If it's being done in
> >>> Remedy...if you have SRM, you would use a Work Order. Correct?
> >>>
> >>> Servers get in...it's configured, say by Servers Group. Then any extra
> >>> work beyond basic setup is done by Server Group. CMDB or Asset
> >>> database or whatever system of record is updated. Customer is happy,
> >>> Server Group is done, and may be got some money for their service.
> >>> .
> >>>
> >>> I actually have Help Desk 5.0. That's not a typo. But I would love to
> >>> hear the flow in any environment. I am trying to look beyond what I
> >>> can do right now to what the future can be.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> ___
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> >> Platinum 
> >> Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>ARSlist:
> >>  "Where the Answers
> Are"
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> ___
> > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> > Platinum 
> > Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>ARSlist:
> >  "Where the Answers Are"
> >
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum 
> Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>ARSlist: 
> "Where the Answers Are"
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum 
> Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>ARSlist: 
> "Where the Answers Are"
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to