I recommend you consider a Knowledge Centered Support (KCS) approach to your 
knowledge management implementation.  This is the best practice methodology 
when it comes to knowledge management and is widely adopted by large 
organizations and proven successful.
With a solid process in place your tool (RKM 7.5) will then be used far more 
successfully.
Alan BlakeKnowlysis

--- On Thu, 12/3/09, Drake, David P Mr CTR USA MEDCOM USAMITC 
<[email protected]> wrote:

From: Drake, David P Mr CTR USA MEDCOM USAMITC <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Knowledge Management implementation (UNCLASSIFIED)
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 7:06 AM

Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE

Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 5:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Knowledge Management implementation (UNCLASSIFIED)

** 
If they had a previously run system to do something similar you will
need to consider migration. I remember trying to migrate files from
another KB system a couple of years ago as Remedy KB docs.
 
Scope related questions important too - what goes in what stays out what
gets public what stays internal.
 
Role related questions - who are subject matter experts - who are the
techs who would compose the initial articles..
 
Categorization related questions - to separate lets say IT related stuff
from HR...
 
You migjt also want to discuss the lifecycle of these KB articles.. when
to revise, when to retire..
 
These are the things that come to me at the top of my mind..
 
Joe

________________________________

From: "Drake, David P Mr CTR USA MEDCOM USAMITC"
<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 10:47:24 AM
Subject: Knowledge Management implementation (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE

Good morning all,

We're working on implementing Knowledge Management 7.5 in our
environment.  Does anyone have a list of questions they used in their
own implementation when coming up with functional requirements.  I know
there are any number of ways to do it, just looking for a list that I
can borrow from.  Thanks

Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE

_Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"_
Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"





_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to