Thanks, Tauf!  This is excellent information.

Lyle

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chowdhury, Tauf
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 5:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Regarding Risk in Change Management 7.0.3

Here's a little gem I found in my collection of docs that has to do with Risk 
and how it is calculated and derived in CHM 7.0.3. Enjoy the read everyone!:

*       In the Derived Risk Factors Template for the Risk Factor Type option 
Derived Rating  there are 5 choices available in the Field Name list (Change 
Assignee, Change Implementer, Change Manager, Operational CTI, Support Group 
Name) and for Risk Factor Type option Derived there is 1 choice available (CI 
Priority).
*       On the Infrastructure Change form, Risk Level and the Risk Info button 
will be hidden when the change record has a status value of "Implementation in 
Progress" or later.
*       On the Infrastructure Change form, the View Risk Report navigation item 
will be hidden on New and Search windows
*       Risk Level 1 is the low value and Risk Level 5 the high value, to use 
the computed value of risk set the Risk Level field to NULL and save the change 
record.
*       Risk Weight contains % values of (20/40/60/80/100).
*       The formula for computing risk is as follows:  if RF1, RF2 and RF3 are 
the risk levels of three risk factors associated with the change, and if w1, w2 
and w3 are the respective weightings for the risk levels, total risk (Risk 
Level) is computed using the following formula:
                        RF1*w1 + RF2*w2 + RF3*w3
                        ---------------------------------------
                                w1 + w2 + w3

This version of the formula is used rather than just taking the % weightings 
alone since the sum of the weights is not required to be 100. This formula 
ensures that each risk factor contributes the specified fraction (weight) to 
the overall Risk Level.

Note that if only a single risk factor is associated with the change, its 
effective weighting is 100% regardless of its actual specified weight.

*       High performance rating corresponds to a low risk value and vice versa. 
 In other words, if a Change Manager had a performance rating of 5 (highest) 
and weighted at 100%, the Risk Level corresponding to this rating is Risk Level 
1 (lowest risk).
*       The performance rating given to a change request is used for 
computations starting only when the next change request is submitted.  The 
performance rating given to a change request does not affect its own Risk Level.
*       Certain updates to child records will be rolled back if closing without 
saving. In Risk Determine, if child template entries are created (via Add) or 
deleted (via Delete), closing the Risk Determine entry without saving will 
restore the entry to its prior state.  Any modifications made to child entries 
opened via the View button will not be rolled back.  This includes setting the 
status of a child entry to "Delete", which will cause it to be immediately 
deleted.
*       A similar mechanism has been implemented for Risk Factors Template and 
Answer Choices (risk menu items). Additions and Deletions can be rolled back.
*       Risk Factors Template has a Menu Sequence field in the Answer Choices 
section.  Menu items in the Risk Questions dialog will be sorted on this field.
*       The button "Add/Modify" in Risk Factors Template allows the Answer 
Choice entry selected in the table to be modified in place.  Risk Value and 
Menu Sequence can be modified in-place.  Modifying Menu Label will add a new 
menu entry.  To actually modify the label, the entry will need to deleted and 
re-created.
*       Question Sequence and Menu Sequence fields are automatically set to the 
next applicable integer when the Question Template form is opened.



Tauf Chowdhury | Forest Laboratories, Inc.
Analyst, Service Management
Mobile:646.483.2779


-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martinez, Marcelo A
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Close Down approval - part 2

I believe the OOB number for risk levels is 5. Not sure if you can add any 
more; the back end calculations for risk levels can get pretty intricate!

Marcelo 

**********************************************************************
This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest Laboratories, Inc. 
proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or subject to 
copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible 
for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in relation to 
the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may 
be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this 
e-mail and any printout.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all 
copies of the original message.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to