Will do. On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:43:17 -0500, Axton <[email protected]> wrote:
>Interesting. Your development ui will definitely move much faster. I would >like to hear how things go when in production if you can share that >information later on. > >Axton Grams > >The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in >this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My >voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a >spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, >Inc. > >On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Eric Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Axton. >> >> We decided to go with M3000 after some internal discussion and external >> consultation. The main reasons are: 1) Internally, we have some T5120 >> servers that perform poorly with some applications; 2) I asked BMC support >> for recommendation. BMC doesn't recommend a particular SPARC machine. >> However from previous experience, they found that the T series is good for >> mid-tier but not for CPU intensive operations in AR Server. The V series >> or better yet M series is good for CPU intensive operations. >> >> Eric >> >> >> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 21:32:31 -0500, Axton <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >We are using T5120, T5440, and T2000's to host Remedy. It runs Remedy >> >really well but we are not running the ITSM applications. We are using >> >Solaris 9 Branded Zones with Solaris 10 on the global host. We have done >> >some special things to the boxes. We use libumem instead of libc (slab >> >memory allocator) and we use quiet a few GNU tools because they are more >> up >> >to date. >> > >> >Zones are really nice when you need to clone an environment or need >> >snapshots of an environment. >> > >> >There is an issues with some patches on Solaris 9 Branded Zones where >> >rpcbind stops working with UDP transport for all services (I can get the >> >details if interested) which does not work with Remedy. >> > >> >There is also an issue with Java 1.5 in the Branded Zones (1.4 and 1.6 JRE >> >run fine), which prevents the X based Remedy installers from running at >> all, >> >but a patch or hotfix is available to address that issue. I can get more >> >details here if needed. >> > >> >The only comments I can add is that the cores/threads are not that fast >> >(1ghz, or a little faster), so the things that depend on one fast cpu do >> not >> >perform as well as a say, a single cpu box with a really fast cpu. The >> >boxes handle a large number of concurrent users really well though. We >> are >> >able to support 2k to 4k (max peak) concurrent users on 2xT5120's without >> >much of a load. >> > >> >Compiling software on these boxes, say compared to a SunFire or a M- >> Series, >> >is slow though. The concurrency on the cool-threads is great though. >> > That's the trade-off. >> > >> >The zone technology still has some maturing to do, as compared to openvz >> >(Linux) or bsd jails. Sun is making strides in the right direction, but >> >they still have some catching up to do. >> > >> >With the zones, some of my favorite tools simply don't work because the >> >container technology is not mature. Examples include lsof, tcpdump, and >> >some other things. This is because they have not come up with a >> >good privilege separation model to allow the zones to access kernel memory >> >specific to the zone. There are hacks to work around this, but in the >> >current model they create gaping holes in the security of the >> virtualization >> >because they allow the zones access to the kernel memory for every other >> >zone and the global host. This makes troubleshooting in zones impossible >> or >> >hap-hazard, at best. >> > >> >Axton Grams >> > >> >The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in >> >this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My >> >voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as >> a >> >spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, >> >Inc. >> > >> >On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Eric Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> We are looking into purchasing a Sun T5120 to host AR System 7.5 and >> >> Remedy apps (ITSM, CMDB, SRM, and SLM) with about 400 concurrent users. >> >> The other options is M3000, which is a lot more expensive. >> >> >> >> Is anyone using T5120 (or any of Suns cool-threads series of servers) >> >> to host AR System and ITSM apps? Any feedback is appreciated. >> >> >> >> Eric >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> ____ >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org >> >> attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" >> >> >> > >> >__________________________________________________________________________ >> _____ >> >UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org >> >attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" >> > >> >> >> ___________________________________________________________________________ ____ >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org >> attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" >> > >__________________________________________________________________________ _____ >UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org >attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
