Hi all,

I did not understand the license... well, but the fishing model really help
me here...
This is a great thread, as I learn something new today.

Thanks
Andrew.

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Brock, Anne <anne_br...@bmc.com> wrote:

>  And just as a reminder (although Dave is the official voice of BMC) -
>
>
>
> Free read/submit is intended as a convenience for people - usually end
> users -  to submit their own tickets; if they then need to add an update
> they can.
>
>
>
> One should not try to get around this by, for an example, having a help
> desk person take the ticket on the phone; putting them as the submitter; and
> then letting them work the ticket through to the end or put in updates from
> the second level people who are actually working the ticket without a write
> license. Or let's say I'm a change person; if I open a change request for
> myself and then want to work it all the way through to completion - I should
> have a write license.
>
>
>
> If one is working a ticket, one is expected to have a write license. There
> are always technical tricks you can do, but those are not allowed (the EULA
> has wording to this effect).
>
>
>
> Anne
>
> *** not speaking officially from BMC but trying to ensure the point of read
> vs write licenses are not missed ***
>
>
>
> now, back to the smoked salmon...
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Roberts, Chas
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:38 AM
>
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: License Question...
>
>
>
> Hi David,
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> So in the case of custom in-house developed ARS applications licenses are
> required to be purchased for those who need update access to tickets they
> did not submit, in effect limiting the licenses required to only those
> individuals, rather than some percentage of the total population of
> submitters, correct?
>
>
>
> Or put another way, there is no requirement to purchase a large number of
> unnecessary licenses for those who do not update tickets they did not
> submit?
>
>
>
>
>
> Chas
>
>
>
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: License Question...
>
>
>
> From the Configuration Guide:
>
>
>
> The Submitter Mode options are
>
>
>
> *Locked*—Enables users who have their name in the Submitter field to
> modify requests without a write license. This does not apply to users with a
> Restricted Read license who cannot modify requests under any circumstances.
> In the locked submitter mode, after the entry is submitted, the value in the
> Submitter field cannot be changed.
>
>
>
> *Changeable*—Requires users to have a write license to change any record,
> including requests for which they are the submitter.
>
>
>
> So ignoring business licensed rights for the moment, a user with a read
> license and submitter mode set to “Locked” would be technically able to
> submit data to the system and modify their own submissions since their name
> is in the “Submitter” field.
>
>
>
> -David J. Easter
>
> Manager of Product Management, Remedy Platform
>
> BMC Software, Inc.
>
>
>
> The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in
> this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.  My
> voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a
> spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software,
> Inc.
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Roberts, Chas
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 27, 2011 09:11 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: License Question...
>
>
>
> Notwithstanding any requirements for licensing that may apply for using
> canned applications, is my understanding of “Submitter Mode Locked” sound?
>
>
>
> I am only referring to user developed ARS apps.
>
>
>
>
>
> Chas
>
>
>
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: License Question...
>
>
>
> You are purchasing the business license rights to use the Self-Service *
> applications* (SRM and RKM) in a defined manner – namely to allow
> end-users to submit service requests, view their service requests and to
> view knowledge articles provided for self-service.  Regardless of any other
> business rights obtained through other licenses purchased, you have to
> purchase Self-Service user capacity to use SRM and RKM for self-service.
>
>
>
> When you purchased AR System, you obtained unlimited rights to use the
> “free” read licenses within applications that have no other restrictions
> around their use.  For Self-Service, there is an additional business license
> right that is needed to use the applications for a specific purpose.
> Regardless of the technology that enables their use, you have to have the
> business license rights to use the application as defined in your purchase
> contract.    The Self-Service business license is needed in addition to any
> other licenses.
>
>
>
> Trying to make this into a dumb metaphor, think about a fishing license.  A
> fishing license enables you to go fishing.  However, while the fishing
> license enables you to fish, there may be additional rules in place that
> limit you to catch a certain number of fish, only fish in certain places or
> disallow the catching of certain kinds of fish.  Even though your fishing
> license says you can go fishing, that license is further modified by other
> “contracts” (in this case, laws or regulations).   So just because I have a
> fishing license that lets me catch an unlimited amount of sardines, that
> same license may not enable me to catch an unlimited amount of tuna.  To
> catch additional tuna, I may have to get a business license that allows me
> to catch more than what I could normally catch with a standard fishing
> license.
>
>
>
> So if you use the SRM or RKM applications for self-service as an end user –
> regardless of other licenses or enabled technology – you need to have the
> business rights to use the application for that purpose.
>
>
>
> -David J. Easter
>
> Manager of Product Management, Remedy Platform
>
> BMC Software, Inc.
>
>
>
> The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in
> this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.  My
> voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a
> spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software,
> Inc.
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Roberts, Chas
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 27, 2011 07:54 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: License Question...
>
>
>
> Thanks, David.
>
>
>
> Now I am confused.
>
>
>
> Isn’t the purpose of the “Submitter Mode Locked” to enable “Requesters” to
> interact (including providing supplemental information) with tickets they
> have “Submitted”, without the cost of a license?  Not tickets that others
> have “Submitted”, but only where they were the “Submitter”.
>
>
>
> In the case of a user created ARS application, the requirement for
> purchasing licenses is limited to folks who need to update tickets
> “Submitted” by others?
>
>
>
> And at the same time, cannot users who have no license other than the free
> read license, browse the tickets contained within a user created ARS
> application, freely viewing a ticket regardless of who “Submitted” it?
>
>
>
>
>
> Chas
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the
> individual(s) to whom it is addressed. The information contained in this
> message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure.
>
> If you are not the author's intended recipient, be advised that you have
> received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding,
> printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this email in error please delete all copies, both electronic and
> printed, and contact the author immediately.
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to