Which staging form are you referring to? Thanks - and wonder why BMC
support would not know this?

 

Regards,

 

Andrew Goodall

Software Engineer 2 | Development Services |  jcpenney . www.jcp.com
<http://www.jcp.com/>  |  

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Remedy
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 9:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: WARNING OF BAD AS DESIGNED FEATURE IN ITSM - zero in
internet email field for person is not good.

 

When things like this happen, the only way to get rid of these emails
before they go out is to start deleting pending emails from the staging
form.

 

I had this similar problem 2 weeks ago. Out of the roughly 30,000 emails
that got generated, I was able to delete 20,000(give or take). Had to
keep refreshing the form for a while till they stopped getting created.
Hind-sight I should have just changed the status to "sent" as a bulk
modify would have been faster than delete.

 

I am sure all seasoned developers have run into this at some point. 

 

Now You now need to setup some workflow to ensure the email address
doesn't get populated with a zero again... The email issue has been
around since version 6.x, and don't think it's going away anytime soon.



Sent from my iPhone


On Jun 8, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Andrew C Goodall <[email protected]>
wrote:

        ** 

        We process about 20-30k emails a day - if we just shut down
email then we hurt more people.

        Our issue was to let all email through other than this one
particular email that got sent to everyone.

         

        In fact the email engine performed great throughout this event
and processes all email as we would expect and other notifications were
not considerably delayed - it was just kept extra busy for 2 days

         

        What we need BMC to answer is how to isolate and remove a
particular notification from NTE before it gets to the AR System Email
Messages.

         

        Regards,

         

        Andrew Goodall

        Software Engineer 2 | Development Services |  jcpenney .
<http://www.jcp.com/> www.jcp.com  

        
________________________________


        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of patrick zandi
        Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 9:12 AM
        To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
        Subject: Re: WARNING OF BAD AS DESIGNED FEATURE IN ITSM - zero
in internet email field for person is not good.

         

        ** why not just go to the ar email config and disable it ? or
change the password and let it fail even...
        but I think you are asking for a button next to turn off
escalations that is turn off email?

        On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Axton <
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> wrote:

        What is 'as designed' is the ability to use a group id, group
name,
        login name, or email address in the email message delivery
fields.
        When a number is seen, it is interpreted as a group id.
        Unfortunately, 0 is the group id for public.
        
        Not saying it's right, but that's what it is, and the
application can
        (and in my opinion, should) account for this.
        
        Seems a knob could be added to the email engine that disallowed
this,
        or defined a threshold for group member count could be used to
address
        this.  It's not the first time this has burned someone (not
        necessarily in the ITSM world either).  The notification engine
may
        add a layer of abstraction on top of the email engine that
discounts
        the use of this capability at the email engine layer (I don't
know
        enough about it to say for sure).
        
        Take a system that has an email auto-reply set up.  Send an
email to
        that system with a reply-to address of 0 and guess what you
would get.
        
        Axton
        
        The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action
expressed
        in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software,
Inc.
        My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to
convey a
        role as a spokesperson, liaison or public relations
representative for
        BMC Software, Inc.

        
        On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Andrew C Goodall <
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> wrote:
        > **
        >
        > All,
        >
        >
        >
        > FYI - for ITSM users
        >
        >
        >
        > We had an issue last week in which a service desk associate
created a
        > proposed people record for a vendor and entered a zero as the
persons email
        > address.
        >
        > Upon creating the incident with the new person as the customer
the BMC
        > workflow treated "zero" in the email field as meaning I need
to email
        > EVERYBODY that has a people record!!!! For use that is over
300,000 records!
        >
        >
        >
        > Needless to say our executives were not very happy about this,
we had opened
        > a CRITCAL issue with BMC on this because it was not as simple
as deleting
        > all the relevant records from "AR System Email Messages" form
since the NTE
        > functionality was shipping 100 records or so every few minutes
to be
        > processed by the email engine in "AR System Email Messages".
        >
        >
        >
        > We needed to STOP the messages from getting processed by NTE,
but BMC
        > support did not have a remedy (HA - pardon the pun), they said
we just had
        > to let them process - RIDICULUOUS! Furthermore we found out
through this
        > issue that this is an "AS DESIGNED" feature - RIDICULULOUS!
        >
        >
        >
        > So be warned if you don't want your service desk to accidently
email
        > everyone in the company add an active link to validate the
value in the
        > email field when creating a people record.
        >
        >
        >
        > It is breath taking to me why BMC would think this is a good
"AS DESIGNED"
        > feature. I can understand needing that capability for use in
workflow - but
        > for goodness sake only allow it on a back end hidden field
e.g. a z_ field,
        > and NOT a forward facing field editable by users.
        >
        >
        >
        > Regards,
        >
        >
        >
        > Andrew Goodall
        >
        > Software Engineer 2 | Development Services |  jcpenney .
<http://www.jcp.com> www.jcp.com
        >
        >
        >
        > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
entity to
        > which it is addressed and
        > may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If the
reader of this
        > message is not the intended
        > recipient, you are hereby notified that your access is
unauthorized, and any
        > review, dissemination,
        > distribution or copying of this message including any
attachments is
        > strictly prohibited. If you are not
        > the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete
the material
        > from any computer.
        >
        > _attend WWRUG11 <http://www.wwrug.com> www.wwrug.com ARSlist:
"Where the Answers Are"_

        
________________________________________________________________________
_______
        UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at
<http://www.arslist.org> www.arslist.org
        attend wwrug11 <http://www.wwrug.com> www.wwrug.com ARSList:
"Where the Answers Are"

        
        
        
        -- 
        Patrick Zandi
        _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 

        
        The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and 
        may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If the
reader of this message is not the intended
        recipient, you are hereby notified that your access is
unauthorized, and any review, dissemination,
        distribution or copying of this message including any
attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not
        the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer.

        _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to