It shouldn’t be a big deal then to change the workflow on development and test it and then roll out to acceptance and production.. I would see a weeks work max which include code change by way of massaging the def files, testing on dev, moving to acceptance and then having the changes ready for production.. Some sort of an emergency change implementation..
Joe From: Drew Shuller Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 4:52 PM Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Changing the Group Name ** Even less, Joe! On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Joe Martin D'Souza <[email protected]> wrote: ** I’d still think it would be easier to mend your workflow than mend a group name.. Mending workflow using export of defs to an xml file is easy breezy.. its almost easier done than said.. that easy.. Especially in your case since you say it’s a home grown system, I cannot imagine there being more than a couple of hundred forms at max and a 2 or 3 thousand pieces of other workflow at max? Which is almost nothing.. Joe _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
