The asset management sandbox has a number of bugs that have progressively
been fixed but issues still exist with AM 7.6.4 SP1:
- the AL's pushing to create the sandbox CI's don't use matching Ids but use
a list of computer system attributes. This means that attributes in other
classes and bespoke attributes in the computer system can't be updated.
- BMC changed the push fields to use matching Ids. CI's that are weak
children cannot then be updated as the system thinks you are trying to set
certain hidden fields that it won't allow.
- the recon process is triggered when the sandbox CI is saved. If you create
a relationship to a new CI then, depending on the performance of your
system, it is possible that the recon job identifies the new CI but not
relationship as it is created after the CI. The final activity of the recon
job deletes the CI which then deletes the relationship before it is merged
with the production dataset.
- you can't create a new parent CI from an existing CI as the workflow
hardcodes the new CI as a child (even though the partent/child option is
presented to you)
- you can't create a new CI with the same name as an existing CI as the
recon engine will match the new one to the old one (if you wanted to modify
the old one you would have searched for it)


The reason for leaving it on is that the attributes in the CI's then get
flagged as having been last updated via the sandbox.
This then allows you to control which attributes are updated by which source
datasets.
Without the sandbox enabled you may need to add the target dataset to the
precedence set which can cause unexpected results.

The issue reported by Tricia should be traceable by AL logging and
relatively easily fixed.

I would advise leaving it on unless the issues found make it impossible to
use.

Cheers

Peter



-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lyle Taylor
Sent: 15 September 2011 16:35
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Turning off Sandbox for the CMDB

Did you add any custom workflow such as data validation to the CMDB? The
Sandbox Create stuff is coming from something in the update process in the
sandbox failing and not completing.  Any workflow such as validations that
stop normal processing will foul that up.

The first step in the sandbox process is to create a frame of the existing
"gold" CI, which it names Sandbox Create.  It then pulls in the rest of the
information and adds the changes that were made by the user.  It then
reconciles that back into the gold dataset.  The big problem is that that
set of operations don't happen as a transaction, so if anything fails along
the way, you're left with incomplete data, and the reconciliation still runs
and pushes that incomplete data back into your gold dataset.  I thought they
had supposedly fixed that in 7.5.  I know that my recommendation for 7.1
(CMDB 2) is to turn it off as it provided no value in most cases and
generally caused issues.  Not sure how that applies to 7.5, though...

Lyle

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tricia
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 7:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Turning off Sandbox for the CMDB

We are facing a major problem with our CMDB (Asset Management 7.5, ARS 7.5).
The CIs are being renamed to Sandbox Create at random times. It is happening
with great frequency and BMC Support has no idea how to resolve it.

We are not using the CMDB with any discovery tools or any data imports. So I
am planning on turning off the Sandbox feature. Are there any issue I should
be aware of? Has anyone else done this?

Thanks
Tricia

____________________________________________________________________________
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11
www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.

____________________________________________________________________________
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to