Or it outgrew it's shoes, which means that it was being used in some way or on a scale that was never intended.
>From my observations: Someone writes something useful, but not very well (it quickly fills a need). Someone comes along and says, hey, that's great, let's distribute it to the world. It gets out there, then someone else comes along and says, hey, let's make it do X, Y, and Z as well, since it's in the same realm. Someone adds X, Y, and Z, and all of the sudden things start to fall apart. Someone else comes along and says, this is horrible; to get it to do what you are trying to do we need to toss it out the window and design this thing from the ground up. The intent at the final stage is to permanently address the issues, but the process typically repeats itself. Foresight is something for which there is more demand than supply. Axton Grams On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:56 AM, John Sundberg < [email protected]> wrote: > ** > Reading between the lines when somebody says "Completely redesigned…" > > 2 things should come to mind. > > 1) Current implementation must blow chunks > 2) New implementation is untested > > > > More lipstick please... > > Hi-ya - karate chop!!! > > -John > > -- > John David Sundberg > 235 East 6th Street, Suite 400B > St. Paul, MN 55101 > (651) 556-0930-work > (651) 247-6766-cell > (651) 695-8577-fax > [email protected] > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
