I prefer SQL
El 28/09/2012 16:43, "David Durling" <[email protected]> escribió:

> Though I have to say that Fred's point makes a lot of sense - you need
> someone around who knows how to handle the database!
>
> David D.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Durling
> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:36 AM
> > To: '[email protected]'
> > Subject: RE: SQL or Oracle
> >
> > There was a recent discussion on this, if you check out the list
> archives.
> >
> > I'm not a dba, but one thing I'm looking forward to with MS SQL, if we
> move
> > to it from Oracle, is the case-insensitive searching without having to
> do any
> > special setup on the db side.
> >
> > David
> >
> > David Durling
> > University of Georgia
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
> > > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:25 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: SQL or Oracle
> > >
> > > Oracle is not bad either.   Usually I ask what does your company
> support
> > > most.  If you have better people for Oracle then choose Oracle, same
> > > goes for MS-SQL.
> > >
> > > Fred
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
> > > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 9:22 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: SQL or Oracle
> > >
> > > **
> > > The question I find most relevant is what platform your organization
> > > has the resources to support.  Most of us can handle most day to day
> > > MSSQL tasks.  Not so with Oracle, which requires someone trained and
> > experienced.
> > > Rick
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hennigan, Sandra
> > > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 9:08 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: SQL or Oracle
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I am setting up a brand new ARS with ITSM. The big decision is whether
> > > to go with SQL or Oracle as the backend.
> > >
> > > I prefer SQL; management thinks Oracle.
> > >
> > > Without starting a frightening Friday foray on the List, does anyone
> > > (LOL) on the list have an opinion? I really need some feedback with
> > > the Pros & Cons of using either DB that I can take to my managers.
> > >
> > > So you know, the system is for an organization that will support about
> > > 3000 end users (Support staff plus customers). We have the entire ITSM
> > > suite to deploy which will be accomplished in stages. We will start
> > > with Asset and Incident Management then move onto Change and Release
> > then to SRM.
> > >
> > > Anyone?
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Sandra Hennigan
> > > Remedy Developer
> > >
> > >
> > __________________________________________________________
> > > _____________________
> > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend
> > > wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to