My opinion is that 'performance metrics suck and don't work the way they are intended'. There has been healthy debate over the years regarding exactly that subject, and every time it's happened, either on the list or otherwise, it ends up being that no one 'metric' can accurately say that this developer is doing 'better' than another developer.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Charlie Lotridge <lotri...@mcs-sf.com> wrote: > ** > Hi all, > > I'm curious...what are your opinions about what might be useful metrics to > use to judge the performance of Remedy developers? To narrow the > conversation a bit, let's just talk about during the creation of a new > custom application, or custom module to an existing application. In other > words for code generation. > > So for example, you might tell me that a good developer can create at > least 50 logic objects (active links/filters/escalations) in a day. Or > create & format one form/day. > > What are you opinions? > > Thanks, > Charlie > _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
