Any suggestions or comments should go on the issue itself, so that they
won't get lost.

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Nicky Ramone <[email protected]> wrote:

> Great.
> May I suggest that you take into account certain flexibility into what
> "latest" means?
>
> It could be useful at least to consider the equivalent to LATEST (aka
> newest version between snapshots and releases) and RELEASE (latest
> release), as well as a particular snapshot by its canonical name (e.g.,
> 1.0-SNAPSHOT).
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Noam Y. Tenne <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nicky,
>>
>> Both your guesses are right, this is indeed the intended behavior; only
>> if the artifact is literally stored under it's non-unique snapshot version,
>> it may be retrieved under non-unique snapshot path.
>> That being said, work is underway on an 
>> issue<https://issues.jfrog.org/jira/browse/RTFACT-4255>to, among other 
>> things, provide the latest snapshot of a version.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Noam
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Nicky Ramone <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm...I came across this thread answered by Noam:
>>>
>>> http://forums.jfrog.org/Downloading-an-timestamed-SNAPSHOT-artifact-NOT-using-mnv-using-wget-for-example-td7031303.html
>>>
>>> It looks like what I need is not possible.
>>> Wouldn't it be a desired feature to retrieve the artifact with the URL
>>> easily? at least via the REST API?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Nicky Ramone <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> I am unable to retrieve a SNAPSHOT artiact without defining the unique
>>>> version URL.
>>>> Example:
>>>> I cannot get the war file from this URL:
>>>> http://server/artifactory/libs-snapshot-local/com/bleh/foo-web/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/foo-web-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>> But I can get it from this URL:
>>>> http://server/artifactory/libs-snapshot-local/com/bleh/foo-web/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/foo-web-1.0.0-20120316.211607-1.war
>>>>
>>>> Is this the intended behavior? In local caches the
>>>> foo-web-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT is deployed as well, but not in Artifactory.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance for your help.
>>>> Cheers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF email is sponsosred by:
>>> Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Artifactory-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/artifactory-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF email is sponsosred by:
>> Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
>> _______________________________________________
>> Artifactory-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/artifactory-users
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF email is sponsosred by:
> Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
> _______________________________________________
> Artifactory-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/artifactory-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Artifactory-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/artifactory-users

Reply via email to