On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Slichter, Daniel H. (Fed) <daniel.slich...@nist.gov> wrote: >> And a 16 ns pulse would be just about 20 samples. Why would you want to >> describe that using ~4 spline knots each being maybe 16 times 16 bits in >> data. >> If you need the full bandwidth, the idea of compression using splines is not >> very helpful. In that case you would need to design in a little "real" AWG >> player that plays snippets from a wide BRAM. > > Sure, that is a better solution for these kinds of things. I am just saying > that unless we have some suitable feature like this, no superconducting > people will be interested in the system. So we should design things in such > a way that this is a possibility, to maximize the target audience.
Sure. If people want "real" sample-based AWG, it should be into the specification. I was just pointing out that trying to do it with spline interpolators is not particularly bright. _______________________________________________ ARTIQ mailing list https://ssl.serverraum.org/lists/listinfo/artiq
