Hi Jana, In general, the higher accuracy always wins. So, if the bandwidth divided by freq_numbers is larger than freq_spacing, the latter will be used.
Whether the behaviour you see with metmm_accuracy is intentional, I leave to Alex to comment on. cheers, /oliver > On 2 Mar 2016, at 10:46, Jana Mendrok <jana.mend...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > when running the metmm system with the provided sensor setups, i had expected > that the set freq_numbers (depending on metmm_accuracy choice) are ruling, > ie. it's always them that are applied. > however, i found that freq_spacing is set such that it overrules freq_number > occasionally (eg. several of the ISMAR channels with metmm_accuracy=0, > leading to 58 f_grid points for the 15 existing ISMAR channels, instead of > 2x15=30 I had expected). > > is this intended behaviour? or a bug? > > wishes, > Jana _______________________________________________ arts_dev.mi mailing list arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_dev.mi
