> On 4 Mar 2016, at 08:43, Jana Mendrok <[email protected]> wrote: > > > For ISMAR the number of frequencies for the fastest accuracy is not set to 1 > for all channels ike for other sensors. Instead channels 10-13,19,20 are set > to -1 which means the default frequency spacing is used instead. > > no, now we do definitely missunderstand each other. the ones you point out > are channels not yet implemented. look at the other settings for them. plenty > of question marks there. ;-) > what i mean is e.g. happening for channel 18, which is a very broad channel. > there the 1GHz spacing overrules the freq_number = 1 set for metmm_accuracy=0 > and results in 5 freq points per passband.
Ah, ok, sorry for the confusion. Got it now. Yes, that can happen. I don't think that was intentional. We'll have to find a way to set the frequency spacing wide enough for those cases to avoid that from happening. I'll discuss it with Alex. cheers, /oliver _______________________________________________ arts_dev.mi mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_dev.mi
