Hi Jana, this behaviour is intentional, you are guaranteed to get a least the frequency number and spacing you specified. The tighter constraint wins.
Best wishes, Stefan > On 02 Mar 2016, at 14:06, Oliver Lemke <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Jana, > > In general, the higher accuracy always wins. So, if the bandwidth divided by > freq_numbers is larger than freq_spacing, the latter will be used. > > Whether the behaviour you see with metmm_accuracy is intentional, I leave to > Alex to comment on. > > cheers, > /oliver > > >> On 2 Mar 2016, at 10:46, Jana Mendrok <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> when running the metmm system with the provided sensor setups, i had >> expected that the set freq_numbers (depending on metmm_accuracy choice) are >> ruling, ie. it's always them that are applied. >> however, i found that freq_spacing is set such that it overrules freq_number >> occasionally (eg. several of the ISMAR channels with metmm_accuracy=0, >> leading to 58 f_grid points for the 15 existing ISMAR channels, instead of >> 2x15=30 I had expected). >> >> is this intended behaviour? or a bug? >> >> wishes, >> Jana > > _______________________________________________ > arts_dev.mi mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_dev.mi _______________________________________________ arts_dev.mi mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_dev.mi
