Hello, Since I created the mess I can remove them. I can also update the documentation.
(I anyways have uncommitted code since a few months ago for an update to HTP. That we have HTP should probably also be documented, even though we have no good way to actually use it yet, whioch is why I have left undocumented so far.) About the documentation cross reference, I can add this as well while I am working on this. A larger question though is if this should not be made painfully obvious in the creation of the "-d" output instead of explicitly documented per variable? The online documentation gives all methods that has the line shape as output and I think "-d" should be more similar to "-s". In other words, a lot of the other variables do not cross-reference so there is no consistency in "-d" without proper defaulting behavior. //Richard 2016-04-01 9:47 GMT+02:00 Stefan Buehler <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > > I agree that there should be at least a cross-reference in the built-in > documentation. Who is doing that, and the removal of the Kuntz lineshapes > except Kuntz6? > > All the best, > > Stefan > > > On 31 Mar 2016, at 19:45, Patrick Eriksson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > >> if not needed, perhaps we could simply remove the less accurate Kuntz > >> lineshapes, and just keep the Kuntz6 one? > > > > > > OK for me. > > > > And in general, things like this should be documented in some manner. > For example, could it be marked in abs_lineshapeDefine what lineshapes that > supports Jacobians? > > > > That said, is it not a bit odd that to find a definition of linesshapes > you need to do: > > > > arts -d abs_lineshapeDefine > > > > and not > > > > arts -d abs_lineshape > > > > ? At least I tried the last version first when updating my memory. > > > > Bye, > > > > Patrick > > > > > > > >> /Stefan > >> > >>> On 31 Mar 2016, at 17:25, Richard Larsson <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello Ole, > >>> > >>> Yeah, it is because we moved a lot of the partial derivatives to > >>> lower levels. You are asking for a partial derivative of something > >>> that requires knowing the partial derivative of the line shape with > >>> respect to your variable. This is trivial if the function returns > >>> the phase shift but not so trivial otherwise. In short, it > >>> requires a numerical implementation for the faster line shapes. > >>> > >>> The only faster line shape with a numerical implementation so far > >>> is Voigt_Kuntz6. Can you change this to be your line shape? > >>> > >>> //Richard > >>> > >>> 2016-03-31 16:18 GMT+02:00 Ole Martin Christensen > >>> <[email protected]>: I trying to rerun some old code > >>> got the following error message from my arts today: > >>> > >>> > >>> Run-time error in controlfile: > >>> /tmp/atmlab-olemar-tp233502eb_6598_4500_90ae_1aeaf2753936/cfile_yj.arts > >>> > >>> > > Run-time error in method: yCalc > >>> Run-time error in function: iyb_calc Run-time error in agenda: > >>> iy_main_agenda Run-time error in method: iyEmissionStandard > >>> Run-time error in agenda: propmat_clearsky_agenda Run-time error in > >>> method: propmat_clearskyAddOnTheFly Run-time error in agenda: > >>> abs_xsec_agenda Run-time error in method: > >>> abs_xsec_per_speciesAddLines This is an error message. You are > >>> using Voigt_Kuntz3. Your selected *jacobian_quantities* requires > >>> that the line shape returns partial derivatives. Stopping ARTS > >>> execution. Goodbye. > >>> > >>> > >>> anyone know why? > >>> > >>> > >>> Ole Martin > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ arts_dev.mi mailing > >>> list [email protected] > >>> https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_dev.mi > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ arts_dev.mi mailing > >>> list [email protected] > >>> https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_dev.mi > >> > >> _______________________________________________ arts_dev.mi mailing > >> list [email protected] > >> https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_dev.mi > > _______________________________________________ > arts_dev.mi mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_dev.mi >
_______________________________________________ arts_dev.mi mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_dev.mi
