Richard, Oliver,
Thanks for your clarifications. My calculations seem to work now.
Bye,
Patrick
On 2021-09-22 09:56, Richard Larsson wrote:
The 2.5 way of absorption lookup table calculations is being
redesigned. For now you need to manually define the agendas as you do.
Add lines will be removed, at some point, from the xsec code. The
reason it's deprecated is that in normal calculations you should be
putting the line calculations into the propagation matrix agenda.
Lookup calculations are special here since they just do partial
calculations.
//Richard
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021, 08:30 Patrick Eriksson
<patrick.eriks...@chalmers.se <mailto:patrick.eriks...@chalmers.se>> wrote:
Hi again,
Seems that I have found the reason to some of the failing tests "the
hard way". After spending time on some other failing calculations, I
have figured out that the default in ARTS gives absorption
lookup-tables
that miss all lines. For example, TestOdinSMR_1D uses
Copy(abs_xsec_agenda, abs_xsec_agenda__noCIA)
This agenda is defined as
AgendaSet( abs_xsec_agenda__noCIA ){
abs_xsec_per_speciesInit
abs_xsec_per_speciesAddConts
}
No inclusion of lines! Another Odin/SMR test uses
AgendaSet( abs_xsec_agenda ) {
abs_xsec_per_speciesInit
abs_xsec_per_speciesAddConts
abs_xsec_per_speciesAddLines
}
and this works. Both tests generates abs tables.
I get a message that abs_xsec_per_speciesAddLines is deprecated. But
why
removed from the defaults for abs_xsec_agenda before the alternative is
in place?
Anyhow, how shall abs_xsec_agenda be defined to get correct abs tables
in v2.5?
Bye,
Patrick
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Failing tests
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:55:33 +0200
From: Patrick Eriksson <patrick.eriks...@chalmers.se
<mailto:patrick.eriks...@chalmers.se>>
To: ARTS Development List <arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
<mailto:arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de>>
Hi all,
I have spent some time on trying to figure out how the changes in my
branch could have created some failing tests. But just run make
check-all with master and the same tests failed also there, so there
seem to be older issues.
The failed tests listed below. These issues under control? Noticed that
some tests demand an accuracy of 2nK! The deviation was 2.5 mK, which
can be OK. On the other hand, there were also tests failing with
deviations of 30-100 K.
Bye,
Patrick
The following tests FAILED:
42 - arts.ctlfile.slow.artscomponents.clearsky.TestBatch
(Failed)
43 -
python.arts.ctlfile.slow.artscomponents.clearsky.TestBatch (Failed)
152 - arts.ctlfile.slow.instruments.odinsmr.TestOdinSMR_1D
(Failed)
153 -
python.arts.ctlfile.slow.instruments.odinsmr.TestOdinSMR_1D (Failed)
156 - arts.ctlfile.slow.instruments.hirs.TestHIRS_fast (Failed)
157 -
python.arts.ctlfile.slow.instruments.hirs.TestHIRS_fast (Failed)
158 - arts.ctlfile.slow.instruments.metmm.TestMetMM (Failed)
159 - python.arts.ctlfile.slow.instruments.metmm.TestMetMM
(Failed)
180 -
arts.ctlfile.xmldata.artscomponents.arts-xml-data.TestPlanetIsoRatios
(Failed)
181 -
python.arts.ctlfile.xmldata.artscomponents.arts-xml-data.TestPlanetIsoRatios
(Failed)
184 - arts.ctlfile.xmldata.artscomponents.cia.TestRTwithCIA
(Failed)
185 -
python.arts.ctlfile.xmldata.artscomponents.cia.TestRTwithCIA (Failed)
232 - arts.pyarts.pytest (Failed)
