Hi John,
Yes I did build the ascend /trunk. I am on Ubuntu 9.10 and the build process
was quite straightforward.
I understand the new LINK semantics added by Dante for associations needed
by the DAE solvers, which is required for dynamic system modellings. I also
note the new modified syntax for use in dynamic modelling. I have some
points to make:
1. I checked out the /dante branch compiled it. However when I run the
z-link.a4c test the compiler gives syntax error. Basically it does not
recognise the LINK(key,values). Is there something that I am missing?
2. How about using frequency domain representations while making dynamic
models. Then use numerical transform calculators then to obtain the desired
results.
3. How about adding a new 'View' tab to view the variables/notes and then
probably adding an in-built editor for the model files?
Right now I am working on the Save As implementation bug. Lastly, I could
use some pointers for GSoC application process.
On 18 March 2010 04:59, John Pye <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Grivan
>
> Grivan Thapar wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I tried to do small bug-fix with View Notes duplications of notes bug
> > (I have uploaded a patch on the bug-tracker) . This was just for me to
> > get the code compile and see if I could work with Ascend.
>
> Thanks for the patch. I have passed it on to Ben Allan for review. I
> would be curious to know if something strange is happening perhaps at
> the parser stage that's causing this double-listing of NOTES, so maybe
> this patch still doesn't fix the bug at its source. We'll look further
> into it.
>
> > Can I get some more pointers about this?
>
> So you succeeded in getting ASCEND to build, right? If there was any
> difficulty please let us know -- we'll update the wiki or whatever.
>
> > I am also trying to make some Models in Linear Control Systems, if I
> > make something interesting I will update soon. :)
>
> We'll be very interested in any model contributions you're able to make.
> I note that in the case of dynamic systems we have some new
> contributions that make the syntax significantly better, but that's not
> merged into the trunk yet, and will need a little more work in
> particular so that it works correctly with the IDA solver. That's Dante
> Stroe's stuff from GSOC2009. Might be good to try to fix that before
> getting too heavily into setting up a big library of dynamic models.
>
> Thanks again for the patch!
>
> Cheers
> JP
>
> --
> Dr John Pye
> Dept of Engineering
> Australian National University
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ascend-sim-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ascend-sim-users
