Recently, I have been using asciidoc to create a 50/so page document with mixed source code and technical content. Generally, the result has been of high quality but I have run into a few issues. Probably the most significant is this one: bibliographic references always jump to the first page, instead of the cited entry. I am using dblatex vs. fop because the dblatex output includes color high-lighting of the source code text and 'fop' does not.
If there is something that I can do to help track down and fix this problem (inclusive of chasing it down inside dblatex), let me know what I can do to help. I have run into a few other glitches using the dblatex tool chain, or perhaps they are more generic. I will document those issues separately. What I am wondering: Do most users use the dblatex chain, or fop? For me, dblatex produces (generally, not always) better output for my needs. But if its usage is in the minority, perhaps I am swimming up stream? thanks, - Gary -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
