On 14 February 2011 13:06, Gary F. <[email protected]> wrote: > I posted a query to the dblatex users list, and received the following > reply: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=27055480 > > Ben Guillon suggested the following: > * submit to Stuart (the asciidoc author) to modify the bibliography > transformation to XML (it should be even easier than how it is > currently > processed).
Stuart might correct me, but I don't see how it could be done and remain compatible with old documents and other backends. As you saw the [[[ref]]] syntax generates a standard anchor, its not bibliography specific. That way the same input format can be used for backends that don't have a bibliography command as such (eg HTML) by generating a list with ordinary anchors. While this might be an unusual way of using docbook bibliography entries, its perfectly legal and should work. I don't think FOP works by accident, it works because it should. > * if Stuart cannot change something apply a customized dblatex XSL > template to workaround the issue. Tell me if I should provide such a > patch. As Ben admits there is a bug in dblatex I'd suggest that it should be fixed, not worked around :-) Cheers Lex > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "asciidoc" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
