On 20 September 2011 23:46, Ivan Voras <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 20, 12:54 pm, Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 20 September 2011 20:22, Ivan Voras <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Nope. I can send you the document so you can see for yourself. By >> > "support" I mean used as "<img src=xxx.svg>". >> >> Well no wonder you can't get it to work in any browser, thats not >> valid HTML, SVG isn't an image and can't be used with the img tag. > > Nope again. It is really the browsers' fault - but we cannot do > anything about it. http://e.metaclarity.org/52/cross-browser-svg-issues/
Well, that page has several issues: 1. it is several years out of date (Aug 2009), it is talking about firefox 3.0 for example 2. the standard does not require that any given image format be supported by the img tag, and browsers seem to have generally decided to support svg via the object tag which was defined for supporting extended data types. They use the img tag for images, ie pixel arrays, not vector graphics. Cheers Lex > >> In fact its worthwhile looking at how images are created in the >> docbook and xhtml backends and re-use as many ideas as are >> appropriate. > > Thanks for the suggestions! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "asciidoc" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
