On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:35:36 +1100 Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote:
> The answer may not be satisfactory, but it is the answer. Asciidoc is > a small project and cannot expand its scope to include re-writing > documentation of existing toolchains. I must say that I'm a bit surprised with the size of the project - it seems that Stuart is practically the only one commiting the code although I did believe that AsciiDoc is much bigger project. :-( > Especially as any such time would detract from development of > Asciidoc itself. How many people contribute code to it? > For example I don't give a damn about non-English languages, but I > want better formatting of source code documentation (at the moment). > What is important depends on the user. Sure, but from the tool using utf-8 by default one expects to have decent support for non-English languages. In any case, I'm thankful to you for this reply and I'm going to explore quoting attributes/roles as well as re-consider reST/Sphinx considering that, although I prefer AsciiDoc markup, the latter projects seems to have much more people involved. Sincerely, Gour -- One who knows the transcendental nature of My appearance and activities does not, upon leaving the body, take his birth again in this material world, but attains My eternal abode, O Arjuna. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
