On 25 January 2013 10:47, Dan Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Works perfectly with fop which uses different xsl. You could use this >> for your pdf. > > > I would recommend using fop anyway. It produces much better output IMO.
Personally I would agree, and fop is more docbook standards compliant and less buggy. But many people like the latex style of dblatex :) Cheers Lex > > -Dan > > -- > Dan Allen > Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action > Registered Linux User #231597 > > http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen > http://mojavelinux.com > http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "asciidoc" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
