Dan,
Thank you very much, this completely solves my problem!
pax
Gabe
On Friday, October 18, 2013 6:02:53 PM UTC-5, Dan Allen wrote:
>
> Gabe,
>
> A possible solution here is to create an attribute to represent a dollar
> that has a value that's dependent on the backend.
>
> ifdef::basebackend-html[:d: \$]
> ifdef::basebackend-docbook[:d: $]
>
> [subs="attributes,specialcharacters"]
> [source,perl]
> ----
> {d}foo = "bar";
> ----
>
> You can avoid the explicit subs on every source block by overriding the
> default subs for a source block in asciidoc.conf.
>
> If another solution comes to mind, I'll be sure to mention it.
>
> -Dan
> On Oct 18, 2013 9:19 AM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Thanks for the response. I tried Pygments and it works with the html5 if
>> I use "\$", but this breaks the pdf - now that shows the literal "\$" and
>> doesn't treat the "\" as an escape character.
>>
>> Is there a way to get a consistent behavior for the same document in both
>> pdf and html5? I'm hesitant to fiddle with the generated JavaScript (I
>> don't want to redo it by hand and I'm hesitant to go digging for whatever
>> auto-generates the code).
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> pax
>> Gabe
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, October 17, 2013 2:16:44 PM UTC-5, Dan Allen wrote:
>>>
>>> The problem you are encountering is that the latexmath JavaScript is
>>> interpreting those dollar signs as the start of a math expression. That
>>> also explains why it only happens in the html5 output (all the rest of the
>>> backends go through the DocBook toolchain and don't use the latexmath
>>> JavaScript).
>>>
>>> The proper way to insert a dollar sign is to use \$. However, if you
>>> make that change in your example, the dollar still isn't rendered. That's
>>> because the syntax highlighter is separating the backslash and the dollar,
>>> so latexmath still sees the dollar sign.
>>>
>>> One option is to switch the source highlighter to pygments, which seems
>>> to leave the \$ alone.
>>>
>>> A better option may be to hack up the latexmath script to leave listing
>>> blocks alone. You need to look at the JavaScript function AMprocessNodeR.
>>>
>>> -Dan
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "asciidoc" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"asciidoc" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
