On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:20 AM, 'Marco Ciampa' via asciidoc < [email protected]> wrote:
> > Googling "secnums asciidoctor" doesn nothing. Where can I find docs about? > You are missing the "t" in sectnums. See http://asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#numbering > > but I wonder if introducing a new parameter with the very same function > of an existent one was a good idea at all and the reason for it was done... > I stand by my decision. The name "numbered" is ambiguous (not clear what is being numbered) and not consistent with other section-related attributes (e.g., sectids) > > I think that could be useful though if it was possibile to add a command > in the headers like this: > > "from this X level down not/yes enumerated" > > something like > > :numbered level: 3 > > or > > :secnums level: 3 > This is already supported in Asciidoctor. The attribute is named sectnumlevels. See http://asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#numbering-depth The way it is implemented is "number sections up to this level". Cheers, -Dan -- Dan Allen | @mojavelinux | https://twitter.com/mojavelinux -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
