On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:21:13PM -0600, Dan Allen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:20 AM, 'Marco Ciampa' via asciidoc <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Googling "secnums asciidoctor" doesn nothing. Where can I find docs about?
> >
> 
> You are missing the "t" in sectnums. See
> http://asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#numbering
> 
> >
> > but I wonder if introducing a new parameter with the very same function
> > of an existent one was a good idea at all and the reason for it was done...
> >
> 
> I stand by my decision. The name "numbered" is ambiguous (not clear what is
> being numbered) and not consistent with other section-related attributes
> (e.g., sectids)

Ok I was not questioning your decision; I was just wondering the reason
behind it. Sorry, sometimes I write a though to clear my ideas.
Now it is clear why and I agree.

> >
> > I think that could be useful though if it was possibile to add a command
> > in the headers like this:
> >
> > "from this X level down not/yes enumerated"
> >
> > something like
> >
> > :numbered level: 3
> >
> > or
> >
> > :secnums level: 3
> >
> 
> This is already supported in Asciidoctor. The attribute is named
> sectnumlevels. See http://asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#numbering-depth
> 
> The way it is implemented is "number sections up to this level".
> 

Oh I am very sorry, I should read the docs more carefully.

Glad to hear this; I imagine that this is one of those very useful
asciidoctor-only  parameterer ... another reason to choose asciidoctor 
over asciidoc ...

Thanks again,
Regards,

-- 


Marco Ciampa

I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it.

------------------------

 GNU/Linux User #78271
 FSFE fellow #364

------------------------

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"asciidoc" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to