On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:10:48 +1000, Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30 June 2016 at 03:49, Eric <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:17:42 +1000, Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:02:18 +0200, "'Marco Ciampa' via asciidoc" >>><[email protected]> wrote: >> 8>< -------- >> snipped earlier conversation about section numbering parameters >> 8>< -------- >>>> ... another reason to choose asciidoctor over asciidoc ... >>> >>> My recommendations are: >>> >> 8>< -------- >> recommendations snipped >> 8>< -------- >> 8>< -------- > >> So I can't use Asciidoctor, and will continue to use Asciidoc while I >> research a replacement. > > Continuing to use Asciidoc Python is the right thing to do until you > can make the same customisations with another implementation (in its > different implementation specific way). >
And so I will. > >> 8>< -------- > > If Asciidoc Python is so important to you step up and be a maintainer, Life's too short, considering how little I know about Python. > but don't expect that others maintain it for you. I don't, but I've commented elsewhere on the "replacement" idea. > Or if Asciidoctor is > missing something you need help to add it. Life's too short, considering how little I know about Ruby (less than I know about Python). Eric -- ms fnd in a lbry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
