On 9/9/11 Sep 9 -4:11 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Robert Goldman <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > OK. But why do you need to do > (member :foo *features*) > instead of > #+foo > ? > That was the original question. > > > Simple: because the user may switch compilers at run time at any time > he/she wishes. This is quite typical in Windows, where the bytecodes > compiler is active by default because many people do not have a C > compiler in their PC. > > Using #+ hardcodes the behavior in ASDF. This would be short-sighted: > the same ASDF library can handle multiple compilers without needing to > re-load it again.
That is what I had suspected. Question: any objection to modifying your patch so that we have something like: #+ecl (defun use-ecl-byte-compiler-p () (member :ecl-bytecomp *features*)) #-ecl (defun use-ecl-byte-compiler-p () nil) and then call the function in place of the member query in other code? If so, lmk, and we can push this. cheers, r _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
