On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Faré <[email protected]> wrote: > Juanjo, can you test whether this satisfies you? >
Yes, sorry, I did not answer before: I am away from home and took some time to get the changes. It all seems correct to me. Regarding ECL, do fasls have a different extension when using the > bytecode compiler than when using the normal compiler? I hope so and > suppose so. Otherwise there will be an "interesting" issue of having > to reset asdf:implementation-string when switching compiler. > Different compilers produce different file extensions. > Thanks a lot for your support, and sorry for the delay! > Thanks indeed a lot you all for your help. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
_______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
