OK, so Robert pushed something as 2.017.3, and I made a few adjustments as 2.017.4.
Juanjo, can you test whether this satisfies you? Regarding ECL, do fasls have a different extension when using the bytecode compiler than when using the normal compiler? I hope so and suppose so. Otherwise there will be an "interesting" issue of having to reset asdf:implementation-string when switching compiler. (Also, port install ecl failed on a MacOS 10.6.8 machine. But 2.017.4 passes ASDF tests on ECL on a Linux x64 box.) Thanks a lot for your support, and sorry for the delay! —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:02, Robert Goldman <[email protected]> wrote: > I have incorporated Juanjo's patches, together with my slight > modification, and tested them on Mac OS X against: > > ACL > ACL modern > ABCL > CCL > CLISP > SBCL > > ... and it passes all of these tests. > > So I am pushing a new ASDF version (2.017.2). > > Juanjo, will you please test this ASAP? Also, will anyone who has a > linux box set up with all the latest and greatest lisp releases give it > a whirl? I will test on 64-bit ACL there, and a slightly-old SBCL. > > Cheers, > r _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
